after 2nt,I rebid 3♣ as a regular stayman in my heart,but GIB regard 3♣ as 5 card plus ♣ suit ,now for me,how to look for 4-4 major fit in this situation?
Page 1 of 1
We lost major fit
#1
Posted 2013-December-08, 10:04
after 2nt,I rebid 3♣ as a regular stayman in my heart,but GIB regard 3♣ as 5 card plus ♣ suit ,now for me,how to look for 4-4 major fit in this situation?
#2
Posted 2013-December-08, 11:57
You want the strong hand to usually be declarer, so 3♣ is not asking the weak hand to name his major. Certainly, if you bid 3♥ over 2N, you'd want this to be natural, not a transfer to spades. On this hand, you bid 3♦ to show your diamond suit, then North bids 3♠ to show his four spades (since 2N denied five spades) and voila, you have found your fit.
#4
Posted 2013-December-08, 13:31
Bbradley62, on 2013-December-08, 11:57, said:
You want the strong hand to usually be declarer, so 3♣ is not asking the weak hand to name his major. Certainly, if you bid 3♥ over 2N, you'd want this to be natural, not a transfer to spades. On this hand, you bid 3♦ to show your diamond suit, then North bids 3♠ to show his four spades (since 2N denied five spades) and voila, you have found your fit.
If you want the strong hand to be declarer why are you advocating using a method to make the weak hand declarer?
Become yourself.
#5
Posted 2013-December-08, 16:00
Lord Molyb, on 2013-December-08, 13:31, said:
If you want the strong hand to be declarer why are you advocating using a method to make the weak hand declarer?
It is a question of balance.
At one extreme you could employ a system which dictates that responder is never allowed to be the first to bid a denomination that might conceivably end up as trumps. This would effectively limit his initial response to 2♣ as being from a selection of 3♣, 4♣, 5♣, 6♣ or 7♣. I don't expect any contest to my assertion that this would be absurd.
At another extreme you could employ a system in which parties bid their suits naturally, and if responder happens to declare some, well, rub of the green.
Between these extremes there is a multitude of possibilities which vary in complexity, vary in furthering the objectives of have having opener declare, and vary in the likely acceptance by the majority of human players.
On the OP hand, after 2♣-2N, there is a fair chance of Diamonds being the right strain, and a natural 3♦ serves the combined purpose of investigating that possibility while at the same time having that suit played by opener. Sure, if you happen to have a Spade fit then it gets to be played by responder, but just because your system is geared up to having the contract played by opener this is just a preference from which there will be exceptions, as part of that balance.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees."Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
Page 1 of 1

Help
