The contract is 1NT by S, lead was 6♦, which is 2nd/4th according to opps methods if i recall.
Help with a play problem
#1
Posted 2013-November-25, 01:15
The contract is 1NT by S, lead was 6♦, which is 2nd/4th according to opps methods if i recall.
#3
Posted 2013-November-25, 04:52
You have only one sure entry to dummy in diamonds. I would not waste it at trick one.
I would win in hand and play three rounds of spades from the top.
If opponents attack clubs you have a likely stopper. Even if West has the ♣9 and 2 higher honors he will need three leads from East and the defense must be precise.
I intent to get to dummy in diamonds to cash the fourth spade.
My initial aim is
3 spade tricks, 2 diamond tricks and either 2 hearts or one heart and one club if opponents try to establish clubs.
Meanwhile opponents are unlikely to get more than one spade, one diamond and 4 clubs first.
Even if opponents could win seven tricks first, they are unlikely to find this defense.
Rainer Herrmann
#6
Posted 2013-November-25, 12:34
rhm, on 2013-November-25, 04:52, said:
If opponents attack clubs you have a likely stopper. Even if West has the ♣9 and 2 higher honors he will need three leads from East and the defense must be precise.
why does he need all of that, Rainer? One lead from East, lead back from W to E's club honor, and lead back from East...do you play high or the 8? W does not need HH9x, he just needs you to misguess.
#7
Posted 2013-November-25, 14:09
CSGibson, on 2013-November-25, 12:34, said:
I think he meant if west has HH9 third. If west had AK9x or KQ9x they usually would have led that over their 4 card diamond suit depending on the auction so that is diminished. I think LHO would usually not lead AQ9x (again depends on auction) but even then you will be on a heart hook since they have only 4 club tricks.
#8
Posted 2013-November-25, 15:30
rhm, on 2013-November-25, 04:52, said:
You have only one sure entry to dummy in diamonds. I would not waste it at trick one.
I would win in hand and play three rounds of spades from the top.
If opponents attack clubs you have a likely stopper. Even if West has the ♣9 and 2 higher honors he will need three leads from East and the defense must be precise.
I intent to get to dummy in diamonds to cash the fourth spade.
My initial aim is
3 spade tricks, 2 diamond tricks and either 2 hearts or one heart and one club if opponents try to establish clubs.
Meanwhile opponents are unlikely to get more than one spade, one diamond and 4 clubs first.
Even if opponents could win seven tricks first, they are unlikely to find this defense.
Rainer Herrmann
nice clean straightforward and beats the opps over the head with power.
#9
Posted 2013-November-25, 16:26
JLOGIC, on 2013-November-25, 14:09, said:
Still, you can play west for H9x or HHx...I'd be tempted to play for HHx because it would be unusual not to unblock from that combination, personally.
I was thinking about this in terms of restricted choice - if RHO wins the Q, and LHO the ace on the first two club plays, then do the restricted choice mathematics cancel each other out for the three honor combination, leaving psychology to figure it out?
#10
Posted 2013-November-25, 18:24
Winning and driving the spade is just extremely likely to work if we make normal assumptions like LHO is unlikely to have KQxx/AKxx or KQ9x/AK9x and lead a diamond from KTxx or whatever (or lead a low diamond from T976), and when he has 3 clubs we are almost always getting a club trick if they choose to go after clubs.
I will pay off to the parlay of LHO having HHx of clubs and winning and playing a low club back after having led the 6 of diamonds from T976 and their partner putting in the 8
#11
Posted 2013-November-26, 04:22
If it holds you can play heart to the Q.
#12
Posted 2013-November-27, 12:21

Help
