BBO Discussion Forums: Contradicting prior explanation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Contradicting prior explanation

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2013-November-21, 23:22

South (humans in an IMP Robot tourney) opened 1N and North bid 2♥ transfer to spades, followed by East's double to show hearts. South completed the transfer to 2♠, and the explanation says that this shows 3-5 spades. North bid 3♣, showing a second suit and game-forcing values. Various bids (and potential bids) by South are explained as showing only 2 spades. This shouldn't be after 2♠ showed 3-5 of them. Below is one example; there are others. I chose to publish this one because it shows the full explanation of 2♠.


0

#2 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2013-November-25, 09:47

Thanks for reporting.

Nice case based on doubled-accepted transfer.

Fix will be included in v29.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users