Help
Matchpoints.
You are playing DONT, so can show the majors with 2♥...do you do it?
Are there any shifts in conditions that would change your action?...
...if W/W or W/R?
...if declarer was particularly bad?
...or particularly good?
...at IMPs?
Page 1 of 1
Do you show your majors?
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 491
- Joined: 2009-September-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Suburban Philadelphia
Posted 2013-October-16, 13:29
Matchpoints.
You are playing DONT, so can show the majors with 2♥...do you do it?
Are there any shifts in conditions that would change your action?...
...if W/W or W/R?
...if declarer was particularly bad?
...or particularly good?
...at IMPs?
#2
- Slightly less bad player
-
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 964
- Joined: 2012-October-16
- Gender:Female
- Interests:Bridge
Posted 2013-October-16, 13:32
I wouldn't.
Become yourself.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2013-October-16, 13:59
vs. a strong NT, yes. Vs. a weak NT, no. The yellow tab says this is a strong NT; so, I would. Dunno if my 2D to show them affects the decision, but it does give us an extra "out", in case CHO has long diamonds.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,080
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2013-October-16, 14:09
W vs R in MP's I'd try it. But knowing it's not gonna be normal. At all.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,531
- Joined: 2005-October-09
- Location:Netherlands
Posted 2013-October-16, 14:21
If you are playing DONT, this is the hand for it.
DONT is designed to get in on distributional rubbish. This is distributional rubbish, so get in. If you don't get in on this, which is fine, then stop playing DONT because it doesn't fit your style.
Rik
DONT is designed to get in on distributional rubbish. This is distributional rubbish, so get in. If you don't get in on this, which is fine, then stop playing DONT because it doesn't fit your style.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#6
- Redoubling with gusto
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,712
- Joined: 2009-October-19
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
- Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.
Posted 2013-October-16, 15:07
I would bid, but I don't expect this to be the most popular decision in the room. I think this is an auto-bid in balancing seat, and I'd feel better bidding in direct seat at MPs than at IMPs.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,207
- Joined: 2009-April-26
- Gender:Male
- Location:Wellington, NZ
Posted 2013-October-16, 21:21
I would act in the balancing seat only.
Vulnerability is more of an issue when holding hands that are too flat or have soft values. High card strength requirements alone needn't vary much with vulnerability.
Vulnerability is more of an issue when holding hands that are too flat or have soft values. High card strength requirements alone needn't vary much with vulnerability.
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,312
- Joined: 2010-November-21
Posted 2013-October-17, 00:33
The trouble with bidding is that it helps declarer play the hand. LHO only needs half the remaining points to have enough for 3N. I'm not so worried about getting too high ourselves.
I jump in:
1) In balancing seat (where it helps partner if he or she is on lead against 3N).
2) If declarer is known to be weak enough not to be able to use the inference.
3) W/R, because at that vulnerability our agreements are such that I might jump in on a good 4-4, so it's harder for declarer to pinpoint both the high cards and the length.
I jump in:
1) In balancing seat (where it helps partner if he or she is on lead against 3N).
2) If declarer is known to be weak enough not to be able to use the inference.
3) W/R, because at that vulnerability our agreements are such that I might jump in on a good 4-4, so it's harder for declarer to pinpoint both the high cards and the length.
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,053
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-October-17, 01:44
Sure, I am 5-5, I am assuming strong NT.
I kill a lot of space.
Declareres abillity has nothing to do with it.
The only concession: If I know, it is not a reg.
partnership, i.e. a pick up partnership I am more
inclined to go in, they may not have discussed
what to do after intervention.
With kind regards
Marlowe
I kill a lot of space.
Declareres abillity has nothing to do with it.
The only concession: If I know, it is not a reg.
partnership, i.e. a pick up partnership I am more
inclined to go in, they may not have discussed
what to do after intervention.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2013-October-17, 13:00
I would definitely show majors vs strong NT
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2013-October-18, 05:23
Rik is right: Bid with this hand or forget about DONT.
And as others have said: Thinking about bidding against a weak NT would be an overbid.
And as others have said: Thinking about bidding against a weak NT would be an overbid.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1