Page 1 of 1
Post-preempt decision
#1
Posted 2005-January-25, 09:20
Imps, all vuln, expert opps. You hold:
♠ AQTxx
♥ Axx
♦ Qxx
♣ Ax
RHO you LHO pard
3♦.....3♠..pass..4♥*
pass..??
*You are playing transfer advances, so 4♥ is a cue-bid, showing spade support and a good hand.
Your bid? By the way, in case you're wondering, 5♠ would show extras and a hand with no diamond control (it does not ask for help in trumps, rather it asks for help in diamonds).
♠ AQTxx
♥ Axx
♦ Qxx
♣ Ax
RHO you LHO pard
3♦.....3♠..pass..4♥*
pass..??
*You are playing transfer advances, so 4♥ is a cue-bid, showing spade support and a good hand.
Your bid? By the way, in case you're wondering, 5♠ would show extras and a hand with no diamond control (it does not ask for help in trumps, rather it asks for help in diamonds).
#2
Posted 2005-January-25, 09:30
Ackward... how would your partner show a diamond control and a spade fit? Clearly not this way. I look at my hand, and look, I don't have a diamond control either. Let's see, partner no diamond control, me no diamond control. .... I wonder what I am going to bid... oh, I know, 4♠.. next hand...
If your 4♥ can show fit and diamond control, you need to rethink your methods.
Ben
If your 4♥ can show fit and diamond control, you need to rethink your methods.
Ben
--Ben--
#3
Posted 2005-January-25, 09:40
In this case, the transfer advance merely interchanges 4H with 4D. I don't how 4H can be the problem.. in a natural system, does
3D 3S pass 4D
show a diamond control 100% of the time? I don't think so... wouldn't you cue 4D on
KJxx
KQxx
xx
KQx
Or, placing overcaller with a different hand, on
KJxx
AQx
xx
Axxx
3D 3S pass 4D
show a diamond control 100% of the time? I don't think so... wouldn't you cue 4D on
KJxx
KQxx
xx
KQx
Or, placing overcaller with a different hand, on
KJxx
AQx
xx
Axxx
#4
Posted 2005-January-25, 11:35
4S. Three aces are nice, but you have close to minimum for your bid and a balanced hand.
If pd is still interested in slam, he can go forward.
Peter
If pd is still interested in slam, he can go forward.
Peter
#5
Posted 2005-January-25, 13:41
I'm minimum but I like my controls.
If I can find a 4♠ call in tempo, then thats OK. If I stew at all; I'll try 5♠.
If I can find a 4♠ call in tempo, then thats OK. If I stew at all; I'll try 5♠.
"Phil" on BBO
#6
Posted 2005-January-25, 14:00
I declare myselft fixed and bid 4s. I'm happy to go plus after this started with a Vuln Preempt. Ok I might be missing six but....
The legend of the black octogon.
#7
Posted 2005-January-25, 14:05
4♠, I don't like all my ♦s...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#9
Posted 2005-January-25, 15:03
4S on the theory that if all partner needed was 3 Aces and reasonable spades for slam to be good, he could have bid Blackwood.
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
#10
Posted 2005-January-25, 15:43
whereagles, on Jan 25 2005, 03:40 PM, said:
In this case, the transfer advance merely interchanges 4H with 4D. I don't how 4H can be the problem.. in a natural system, does
3D 3S pass 4D
show a diamond control 100% of the time? I don't think so... wouldn't you cue 4D on
KJxx
KQxx
xx
KQx
Or, placing overcaller with a different hand, on
KJxx
AQx
xx
Axxx
3D 3S pass 4D
show a diamond control 100% of the time? I don't think so... wouldn't you cue 4D on
KJxx
KQxx
xx
KQx
Or, placing overcaller with a different hand, on
KJxx
AQx
xx
Axxx
I would bid 5♠ when I only lack ♦ control, not 4♦.
#11
Posted 2005-January-26, 10:16
Thx all. I see my table choice of 5S was somewhat optimistic.
In the actual hand 4S makes, but 5S doesn't.
In the actual hand 4S makes, but 5S doesn't.
Page 1 of 1

Help
