BBO Discussion Forums: 如何在高阶寻找配合 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

如何在高阶寻找配合 防守叫牌的难点

#1 User is offline   yzdhy668 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 235
  • Joined: 2012-August-01

Posted 2013-July-29, 04:56

现代桥牌竞叫异常激烈,如何在高阶寻找配合是初中级牌手防守叫牌的难点,也是桥牌比赛中制造输嬴关键因素之一。


您如果是西家,在同伴X后如何应叫?
0

#2 User is offline   madongjun 

  • China
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,724
  • Joined: 2012-August-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:taiyuan/shanxi/China
  • Interests:Economics、sports

Posted 2013-July-29, 05:12

我会叫4.
0

#3 User is offline   dvd 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 624
  • Joined: 2013-April-15

Posted 2013-July-29, 05:27

4c,如果pd4d就改叫4h;4M就pass,唯一一点担心是pd在你改叫4h后期望过高而继续叫牌。
即便如此,个人认为4c还是比直接4h更合适一些。
0

#4 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-July-29, 05:32

View Postdvd, on 2013-July-29, 05:27, said:

4c,如果pd4d就改叫4h;4M就pass,唯一一点担心是pd在你改叫4h后期望过高而继续叫牌。
即便如此,个人认为4c还是比直接4h更合适一些。

同意,因为这牌更适合于让加倍人坐庄,方向感好。
0

#5 User is offline   jiaxiachun 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 2013-July-06
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2013-July-29, 22:39

View Postdvd, on 2013-July-29, 05:27, said:

4c,如果pd4d就改叫4h;4M就pass,唯一一点担心是pd在你改叫4h后期望过高而继续叫牌。
即便如此,个人认为4c还是比直接4h更合适一些。

如果你pd有17p+,那在你4c后答4M是非常无聊的,而实际上你的牌却不够满贯
The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today .我们实现明天理想的唯一的限制全因我们今天的疑虑。
0

#6 User is offline   IVAN CY LO 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 233
  • Joined: 2013-June-26

Posted 2013-July-29, 23:42

View Postyzdhy668, on 2013-July-29, 04:56, said:

现代桥牌竞叫异常激烈,如何在高阶寻找配合是初中级牌手防守叫牌的难点,也是桥牌比赛中制造输嬴关键因素之一。


您如果是西家,在同伴X后如何应叫?


應叫4H,直覺上四家牌都不是均型,4H 有很大機會打成。
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users