http://tinyurl.com/bl8kulo
My description, as well as if I had bid 3♥, should show 5+ of the suit and 0-2 Clubs, NOT 0-4 Clubs and only 4+.
On a side note, how come the Basic robots seem to defend very poorly, and not only defend poorly, but only for me? If my slow dial=up connection has anything to do with it, then that bites. If you don't believe me, then look up the hands from today, March 7.
Page 1 of 1
Bad description
#1
Posted 2013-March-07, 16:15
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#2
Posted 2013-March-07, 16:37
Hmm, in my view:
-The 3♣ by the robot should show 5+ clubs not 4+ clubs as description states.
-I agree your bids should show nominally 5+ cds, but I disagree that they should absolutely deny club support, I think they are "intended as forcing". Over 3♣ with 5 cd hearts, club fit, decent hand, you might want to look for 4♥despite the club fit. 3♦, I could see doing that with some 1453 type of thing seeing if partner can bid 4cd hearts despite having a club fit.
GIB wants 13+ points to advance over 3♣ though, which seems excessive, 10+ might be more reasonable?
-The 3♣ by the robot should show 5+ clubs not 4+ clubs as description states.
-I agree your bids should show nominally 5+ cds, but I disagree that they should absolutely deny club support, I think they are "intended as forcing". Over 3♣ with 5 cd hearts, club fit, decent hand, you might want to look for 4♥despite the club fit. 3♦, I could see doing that with some 1453 type of thing seeing if partner can bid 4cd hearts despite having a club fit.
GIB wants 13+ points to advance over 3♣ though, which seems excessive, 10+ might be more reasonable?
#3
Posted 2013-March-07, 16:59
You might be right in that I won't be running from 3♣ often. I wish I knew what was best, and with West passing despite a decent hand with 3-card support, I don't know.
THIS HAND though, I despise the 4♠ bid. Why isn't there a 3♥ cuebid showing a LR or better? What would 2NT/3♣/3♦ show, and what should they show?
THIS HAND though, I despise the 4♠ bid. Why isn't there a 3♥ cuebid showing a LR or better? What would 2NT/3♣/3♦ show, and what should they show?
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
Page 1 of 1

Help
