BBO Discussion Forums: Jordan 2NT weirdness - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Jordan 2NT weirdness

#1 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-February-28, 10:19

1♥-(X)-2NT-(p)

Now opener's 3♣ and 3♦ show some sort of game try on a fragment, 3♥ is a minimum. However, 3♠ is a cue bid, denying ♣/♦ control. Yet, 4♣/4♦/4♠ show a second suit.
I think it's silly for 3♠ to be a cue when there's no minor cue available. Also, it makes no sense for 4♠ to just show a biddable suit and a wide range. I think the definitions for 3♠ and 4♠ somehow got interchanged.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users