Page 1 of 1
extreme ODR, remove a double?
#1
Posted 2013-February-16, 16:49
♠4
♥QJ10987652
♦7
♣J6
All vul, IMPs
you make the dubious decision of opening 4♥ at seocnd position. It goes:
(pass)-4♥-(4♠)-double
(pass)
anything else to say?
♥QJ10987652
♦7
♣J6
All vul, IMPs
you make the dubious decision of opening 4♥ at seocnd position. It goes:
(pass)-4♥-(4♠)-double
(pass)
anything else to say?
#2
Posted 2013-February-16, 18:10
#3
Posted 2013-February-16, 18:22
I don't really see much point in pulling.
Although our "D" is low we are not exactly brimming with "O". 5♥ will be no picnic.
Although our "D" is low we are not exactly brimming with "O". 5♥ will be no picnic.
#4
Posted 2013-February-16, 18:44
Pass.
So, we don't have any D. Did we advertize any D? I don't think so. Yet partner doubles. He has 4+ tricks on defense. If he doesn't that is his problem.
Rik
So, we don't have any D. Did we advertize any D? I don't think so. Yet partner doubles. He has 4+ tricks on defense. If he doesn't that is his problem.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#6
Posted 2013-February-17, 00:37
Obvious opening bid is obvious.
Absent an agreement to routinely pull doubles when you have 0 tricks and only leave them in with a potential defensive trick here, obvious pass is obvious.
Absent an agreement to routinely pull doubles when you have 0 tricks and only leave them in with a potential defensive trick here, obvious pass is obvious.
#7
Posted 2013-February-17, 03:00
I don't think 4♥ is dubious.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#8
Posted 2013-February-17, 08:11
if your p trusts you at all your 4h vul bid will at a minimum have
pretty darn decent hearts(2 losers max) if your p thought it
was a good idea to pursue a vul game in hearts they would
have bid 5h not x. You have no idea what the x is all you know
is that p thinks it is better to defend 4sx than be in 5h and there
is nothing so special about your hand that would make you
want to pull a possibly lucrative x into a minus.
IMO p = 10 (5h = 2 and shows a lack of partnership trust)
pretty darn decent hearts(2 losers max) if your p thought it
was a good idea to pursue a vul game in hearts they would
have bid 5h not x. You have no idea what the x is all you know
is that p thinks it is better to defend 4sx than be in 5h and there
is nothing so special about your hand that would make you
want to pull a possibly lucrative x into a minus.
IMO p = 10 (5h = 2 and shows a lack of partnership trust)
#9
Posted 2013-February-17, 08:47
Fluffy, on 2013-February-16, 16:49, said:
... anything else to say?
sorry, or
sorry, I thought you had your double
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
#10
Posted 2013-February-18, 08:15
Thanks, I passed and collected -1190, obviously partner's double was awful.
#11
Posted 2013-February-18, 08:35
Playing with a weak client there is a case for passing as dealer.
Page 1 of 1

Help
