BBO Discussion Forums: 叫牌诊断 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

叫牌诊断

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-20, 05:03



1-再叫1是否适切?理由是什么?
2-你喜爱直接4吗?为什么?
3-自行设计叫牌方案。
0

#2 User is offline   lipeng2076 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2012-September-11

Posted 2013-January-20, 08:17

1,不好。不如2nt。均型旁花止张良好,好庄位,大牌点也适合跳2nt强限制性,后续同伴会体贴的让您描述高花的,因此无需1s,同伴还会认为是非均牌。
2,我也是跳4s进局,4张将牌支持,边花好控制,相当于3个A。
3,1D 1H 2nt 3d 3s 4nt 5d 6s (1430回答3个关键张)
0

#3 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-20, 08:28

可否说的更细致一些,比如再叫1的含义。直接4s的坏处。叫牌进程可否再细致一些,避免想当然。我认为这才得了80分。
0

#4 User is offline   sungh 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 2012-June-29
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:四川省阿坝州

Posted 2013-January-20, 10:07

View Postlycier, on 2013-January-20, 05:03, said:



1-再叫1是否适切?理由是什么?
2-你喜爱直接4吗?为什么?
3-自行设计叫牌方案。

1.我认为再叫1不适切。我以为,开叫人的目的是将持牌情况告诉同伴,如何选择合适的叫品,显示牌型和牌力。开叫人持一手均型牌,首先要把牌型显示出来。再叫2NT也没有否认4张啊,所以叫2NT一下把牌型和牌力显示清楚了。再叫1表明一手非均型的牌,牌力范围较宽。
2.3.我先思考一下。看看大家的意见。
正确的判断来自经验,而经验常常来自错误的判断。

寻找自己的错误才是学习桥牌的唯一进步方法
Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   lipeng2076 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2012-September-11

Posted 2013-January-20, 19:01

1D-1H-1S,应叫人已经看到局了,4s速达到局违背了好牌慢叫的原则。开叫人否定非低限均型牌,如果开叫人持单张无废点有满。因此这时可以用2d垃圾以下,先听一下开叫人的描述后,可轻松加叫开叫人的s来定将牌,后续再展开扣叫等手段推进满贯进程。
0

#6 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-21, 05:29

木子,这是我在专家级论坛上所作的结束性评论内容,你愿意给翻译成中文吗?并且顺便比较一下你我所用的进程的细微之处。

View Postlycier, on 2013-January-20, 04:46, said:

Beg your pardon,I think this problem is very easy and not suitable for Expert-Class Bridge.

1-I never agree with 1,it was underbid,Rebid 1 showed a unbalanced hand and denied low limited hand with balance if play walsh style.2nt can show a strong limited hand,and describe strong hand clearly with18-19hcp .
2-I don't like that style due to waste of space.
3-4-:I prefer wolff signoff convention,very easier to resolve this sort of problems.
1--1
2nt--3
3--4
4--5
6--all pass

3=checkback stayman with game force
3=I have 4 card
4=cuebid with slammish
4=cuebid with slammish
5=trump quality ask bid



0

#7 User is offline   lipeng2076 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2012-September-11

Posted 2013-January-21, 08:31

对不起,请原谅我认为这个问题相对简单,并不属于专家级别的难题。
1,我绝不认同1s。如果采用Walsh风格,再叫1s否定低限均型的非均牌,这是一个低叫叫品。而2nt是高度限制性地描述了准确无误的18-19大牌点的这样一手强牌。
2,我不喜欢4s,因为浪费叫牌空间。
3,我喜欢沃尔夫止叫约定,轻松解决了这些问题:
1d 1h 2nt 3d 3s 4c 4d 5s 6s
3d:逼局性高花重询;
3s:我有4张S;
4c:扣叫,满贯意图;
4d:扣叫,满贯意图;
5s:将牌质量问叫;


心烛老师功力深厚,行云流水简单化解了这类问题。4c好,应叫人听到4d扣叫,就担心将牌,5s一声,明了。对了,老师,请教3s后的4nt是否会被同伴理解为定量呢,谢谢!
0

#8 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-21, 10:47

就是示量叫品,只不过是含5张的示量叫品而已。
0

#9 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-21, 10:50

木子翻译得很好,再次表示感谢。多看看英语论坛上老外的讨论,很受启发,欣赏异域精彩的思想,则此生不负热爱一回桥牌!而一辈子局限于方块字,那就不免滋生狭隘,遗憾的。您说呢?!
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users