BBO Discussion Forums: Lead from 3 small against NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lead from 3 small against NT

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2013-January-09, 16:25

gib_system_notes said:

*NEW* How GIB Defends
When leading from 3 small, it leads top of nothing against NT...

I don't understand why y'all insist on repeating this blatant falsehood, when it has been discussed several times in this forum that GIB consistently leads low from three small against NT contracts. One such discussion included:

View Postbarmar, on 2011-April-30, 00:47, said:

View PostBbradley62, on 2011-April-28, 22:04, said:

GIB's convention card says he leads low from three small against suits and top of three small against NT. Is there something about this hand that causes GIB to lead {low from three small}? (It happened at all 10 tables.)

I think the CC lies, it always leads low from 3 small, against suits and NT. High is always a doubleton.

There are 12 hands available in my myhands in which an advanced GIB led from three small against a NT contract. Once, GIB led T from T9x, apparently thinking that this is a special case. (It isn't, according to the standard ACBL convention card.) On all the other hands, GIB led small. I decided that my opening sentence here was sufficiently rude that I shouldn't make it worse by posting all the hands.

Please either program GIB to lead high from three small against NT, or change the documentation (including the convention card) to reflect the fact that he leads low.

Thanks.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users