BBO Discussion Forums: 如何描述这手牌? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

如何描述这手牌?

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-01, 01:56

View PostAntrax, on 2012-December-26, 13:29, said:

Matchpoints, favourable. Three passes to you.

Playing 15-17 NT, 2/1, do you open anything other than 1?
Over 1 from partner, what do you bid?



开叫1后,假如同伴应叫1,下一步您将如何描述这手牌?
0

#2 User is offline   lipeng2076 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2012-September-11

Posted 2013-January-01, 04:03

2d逆叫,逼叫,等待。
0

#3 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-01, 04:11

View Postlipeng2076, on 2013-January-01, 04:03, said:

2d逆叫,逼叫,等待。


好,如你所说逆叫2,不是不可以,可是同伴突然拉响警报,再叫2nt!,因为我们逆叫后用的是ingberman,它要求你低限叫回3c,高限叫其它。你只好叫3c,那么您认为你的牌完全扛得住3作为最后约定?或者同伴在你3再叫3nt,这个3nt在你仅有15p的情况下可否安全呢?
0

#4 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-01, 04:14

我们知道2逆叫不等同逼叫,但且承诺经得住同伴的三阶示选?如你认为3c可以的话,但问题又来了:当同伴4张7p边缘牌力时,一旦他坐庄3nt可有把握?
0

#5 User is offline   caikq898 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: 2012-May-21

Posted 2013-January-01, 05:04

第4家拿上面这手牌,可以考虑啥定约靠谱,1最安全,可惜不会让打,如果外面大牌均分,24HCP最像的成局定约似乎首推3nt,其次4,再次才是5.
所以可以考虑开叫1NT,最坏的情况是打2定约,可能会-2,-100,但是大多数情况下,1NT起步应该能确保收获正分,这在MP里足以获得接近50%的分数。
0

#6 User is offline   zyp163 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 443
  • Joined: 2012-July-16

Posted 2013-January-01, 19:24

应该说同伴应叫1H后,这牌确实变得好起来了,但有多好很难准确知道:因为同伴的H是什么样的并不明确。
我愿意选2H试探,尽管有点担心H的43。
0

#7 User is offline   cqwbc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 147
  • Joined: 2012-May-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-January-01, 23:47

我和我的PD对于1m——1M;2M——后可以使用库克什约定约定叫-加一级问PD M的支持情况,三张低限、高限、四张有无单缺 手段,因此我选择2再叫。
0

#8 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-02, 01:38

View Postcqwbc, on 2013-January-01, 23:47, said:

我和我的PD对于1m——1M;2M——后可以使用库克什约定约定叫-加一级问PD M的支持情况,三张低限、高限、四张有无单缺 手段,因此我选择2再叫。


哦,这个是3344约定叫,用了它,帮助花色的显示和长短套的展示有一点困难。要知道迟早明手会摊开共享,所以让明手明晃晃展示牌情特征更为优秀。您的方法过去有用的,现在少人在用。想当年我的加拿大老师莫非教我这个约定叫时,在课堂上我就听了几分钟就走开了。我个人不认为这是好的方式。
想想吧,比如你的3张支持是AQX,你还有一个单张。好了,当你实现将吃时,是喜爱小牌将吃还是大牌?这样,你不能不清将吧,就会出现问题。只为解救这一牌面而放弃其它更大概率更具意义的选择是不划算的。
0

#9 User is offline   wuhuan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 2012-October-12

Posted 2013-January-02, 06:51

我想这副牌如果红桃多一张你会很高兴跳叫到3H邀局,现在3张加叫到2H还是合理的吧。
0

#10 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2013-January-02, 07:08

View Postwuhuan, on 2013-January-02, 06:51, said:

我想这副牌如果红桃多一张你会很高兴跳叫到3H邀局,现在3张加叫到2H还是合理的吧。


过去我们遇到过几次,挺上火,不好打,宕的时候多,问题是停在2没关系,可是同伴进局咋办?S一旦将吃,将牌本身就会出问题,还有分布4432分布,凶多吉少。
0

#11 User is offline   cqwbc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 147
  • Joined: 2012-May-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-January-02, 08:48

再叫选择和你的企图有关系,如果你瞄准的是局就再叫2D再加叫牌力牌型都描述清楚了,如果仅仅想试探局 就叫2,同伴来做船长。
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users