BBO Discussion Forums: Opening Lead at BAM - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Opening Lead at BAM

Poll: Opening Lead at BAM (12 member(s) have cast votes)

What's your lead?

  1. Heart spot (4 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  2. Heart ace (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Diamond spot (2 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  4. Diamond queen (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Diamond ace (1 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  6. Club jack (5 votes [41.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 41.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,741
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2012-December-02, 14:24

♠ -
♥ A9xx
♦ AQ98x
♣ JT9x

BAM, both sides vulnerable. Opponents are Meckstroth and Rodwell. RHO (Rodwell) deals and:

1♣(1) - 1NT(2) - Dbl(3) - 2♦
Dbl(4) - Pass - 2♥ - Pass
2NT - Pass - 3NT - All Pass

(1) Strong club
(2) Both minors
(3) Semi-positive hand
(4) At the end of the auction, it was revealed that doubler intended this as penalty but partner took it as takeout.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#2 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2012-December-02, 15:01

View Postawm, on 2012-December-02, 14:24, said:

(4) At the end of the auction, it was revealed that doubler intended this as penalty but partner took it as takeout.


Wow.. it is amazing to me that a pair like Meckwell can have such a trivial misunderstanding.
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-December-03, 02:47

The opponents' misunderstanding tells us quite a lot about the shapes. LHO didn't look for a major-suit fit opposite a takeout double, so presumably he has only four hearts and no more then three spades. RHO didn't raise a heart bid that (from his point of view) showed at least five, so he probably has no more than two hearts. Partner has longer diamonds than clubs, and shouldn't be 3=2 (because he could pass, relying on me to redouble with equal length).

I think the most likely distribution is 3415 - 6331 - 4243. Hence I'm probably getting in twice, once with a heart and once with a club. I lead ♦A.

I may have another problem on the next round, about whether partner would encourage with 10xx.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is online   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,741
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2012-December-03, 21:06

The layout (spots approximate) was:



The contract is always failing barring a defensive mistake later in the hand or a ridiculous low club lead. However, in order to beat the contract two tricks you need to lead either a heart or a top diamond. On a low diamond lead, declarer wins dummy's jack, take a winning spade hook, and establishes a club, and we can take at most two hearts, two diamonds, and a club. On a club lead, declarer plays similarly and if we continue a passive defense he can lead up to the diamond jack twice.

The extra undertrick was important because our teammates defended 2♠ making by north! My passive top club lead at the table didn't get it done.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users