V vs. N
1♦ (P) 1♥ (2♣)
2♦ (P) 2♠ (3♣)
X (P) 3♦ all pass
The 2♠ reverse was game forcing and so a pass over 3♣'s would have been forcing, a double then pull
also forcing to game, or so I thought. I'm Qxxx,AJxxx,Axxx
Page 1 of 1
Reverse, Forcing pass, we've come unstuck
#1
Posted 2012-November-15, 23:49
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
#2
Posted 2012-November-15, 23:53
yes, 2♠ is GF, so passing 3♦ is hopeless. This has nothing to do with the meaning of double.
#3
Posted 2012-November-16, 03:15
This is typically what PUPs do to punish their partners for taking out their penalty doubles. If the auction had been
1♦ - 1♥;
2♦ - 2♠;
2NT - 3♦, would your partner also have passed? Does their bidding actually make sense to you?
1♦ - 1♥;
2♦ - 2♠;
2NT - 3♦, would your partner also have passed? Does their bidding actually make sense to you?
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1

Help
