BBO Discussion Forums: 4-0-6-3 after nt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4-0-6-3 after nt

#1 User is offline   bftboy 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 2009-October-19

Posted 2012-October-23, 16:18



This hand popped up in a mp club game the other day and no one bid the slam, including some pretty good players. Thoughts or comments on how the bidding shoud go after S opens 1nt? Should N xfr or stayman? In either case, what are sensible continuations?

thx.
0

#2 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,080
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-October-23, 18:14

I'd say stayman and 3 over 2. This should be natural and looking for slam (though some people might play FG and others might have relays after stayman). What should South do? He should overcome the MP setup and bid 4; After that it should be easy.

View Postwyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


View Postrbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#3 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2012-October-23, 18:56

Agreeing Hanoi5.
Adding that any opener who who chooses 3N responder must carry on.
1N-2
2-3
3N-4 seems clear. Followed by
5 - 6 (would not bid 5 unless confident pard KNOWS this is a control bid).

4 should be slammish and imply 4=6. A 5-loser opposite a 1N opener should reach 12 tricks unless pard holds wasted .

Some I know allow 4-card major after a transfer:
1N-2N
3*-3 (showing 6-4)
4-4 etc.
Here *=super accept - I like s.

Those of us playing splinter rebids over minor transfers usually won't have 4s, so transferring to and splintering 3 is not available to us (unless we are willing (?) to lose s.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-October-24, 03:41

I try:

1 NT 2
2 3
3 4 (heart stopper, asking)
4 4 (Min, RCKB)
5 6 (2+Q)

Declarer knows that partner holds a minimum opening, two KCs- maybe including the ace of hearts. So the worst hand can be around xxx, AQJx,Qx,AQxx. This slam is far below average, but the hand can be much better, so I think slam is worth a shot.

I bet there are better agreements to find the slam, esp. if you do not use stayman. But I would surely first look for 6 before I try 6 . At imps, I doubt that the 4-4 spade fit would be superior and I can use a tool to show 6+ diamonds and short hearts.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2012-October-24, 03:59

1nt - 2c
2d - 3d
3nt - 4c (anything except 3nt is resulting)
and now opener has a great hand in context
0

#6 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2012-October-24, 04:30

So I like to reverse the meaning of 3S and 4d in all of these sequences, so then you can show diamond support without committing to go past 3N.

Agree that south will always bid 3N in practice over 3D here.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users