yep, confirmed f-uc-k-ed up completelly in the end despite being in at some point against netherlands. And of course yes, this is one of the hands that could had meant that we qualify. first spot before qualify as always for me.
this one might very well have cost me qualifying in the best 16 national teams
#22
Posted 2012-August-14, 17:55
Might be better to examine what you guys did to put yourselves in the Q position, rather than the couple aw-***** boards.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#25
Posted 2012-August-15, 10:36
Was this the difference in qualifying? I see that you were 2 points behind the last qualifying spot, but have no idea what the tie-breaking procedure is.
#26
Posted 2012-August-15, 11:13
Phil had it partially figured out before Spain dropped from a lead which would have tied them with the Dutch (VP's). He got as far as figuring Spain to be 1.3333 in the plus on quotient, but I don't know what the Netherlands' numbers were. That was just before the 2nd to last board (not the given one).
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#27
Posted 2012-August-15, 13:22
aguahombre, on 2012-August-15, 11:13, said:
Phil had it partially figured out before Spain dropped from a lead which would have tied them with the Dutch (VP's). He got as far as figuring Spain to be 1.3333 in the plus on quotient, but I don't know what the Netherlands' numbers were. That was just before the 2nd to last board (not the given one).
Yes, I was crunching a spreadsheet and didn't see the Board 15 result.
Whomever had the cell phone should buy the others a nice expensive dinner and a magnum of first growth.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.

Help
