BBO Discussion Forums: 4NT on competition - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4NT on competition

Poll: 4NT on competition (19 member(s) have cast votes)

what is 4NT?

  1. to play (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. scrambling (1 votes [5.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.26%

  3. slam try (18 votes [94.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 94.74%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-July-13, 16:13

2♠-double-redouble-3♣ (8-10)
pass- 3♠ - 4♠ - pass
pass- 4NT
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-July-13, 17:10

It can't be scrambling, because we could have bid a forcing 3♦ after 3♣. It can't be natural. because we could have bid a natural 3NT or 4NT after 3♣. I think it's Keycard for clubs.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   yin970902 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 2012-May-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chengdu

Posted 2012-July-13, 17:42

A slam try.IMO,
he does neither bid 3nt after partner's 3♣ nor cuebid 3♠ after 2♠.
上善若水，厚德载物
Believe, insist on, Thanksgiving
0

#4 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2012-July-13, 18:30

Slam try, not keycard.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

#5 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2012-July-14, 00:16

4nt is exclusion RKCB with voidness of ♠ ,slam try
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-14, 02:40

I agree it's keycard or slam try in clubs.
I think it's pointless to argue which - if you have agreed to play 4NT as last train slam try for clubs, it's a slam try. If you haven't, it's keycards.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#7 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2012-July-14, 10:55

Its slammsih but It cannot be exclusion since we would have jump to 4S rather than 3S.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#8 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,667
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-July-16, 07:39

All of the possibilities seem to have a flaw. A Last Train slam try is also flawed since presumably 4♣ instead of 3♠ would have been a slam try in clubs. Of course if that would have been Minorwood then 4NT as LTTC seems to make the most sense. But if 4♣ was a slam try and 4♦ Kickback, what are we left with? In other words, before answering I think we need to know what Doubler's alternatives to 3♠ would have meant.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#9 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,656
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2012-July-17, 06:34

View PostZelandakh, on 2012-July-16, 07:39, said:

All of the possibilities seem to have a flaw. A Last Train slam try is also flawed since presumably 4♣ instead of 3♠ would have been a slam try in clubs. Of course if that would have been Minorwood then 4NT as LTTC seems to make the most sense. But if 4♣ was a slam try and 4♦ Kickback, what are we left with? In other words, before answering I think we need to know what Doubler's alternatives to 3♠ would have meant.



IMO this is exclusion but not with a spade void but with the spade A.
The reason for not jumping to 4s immediately was to see if p could bid 3n with
some spade values (or x 4s if it was bid) ---once p seemed to show no useful
spade values the 4n exclusion bid now seemed justified.

Axx Ax AKQJ Qxxxxx
0

#10 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2012-July-17, 08:40

This seems extremely obvious to me, frankly.

If Doubler had first bid 4♣, this would not be a slam try. It would be a simple bump inviting 5♣.
If Doubler had an Exclusion hand, he would bid 4♠ earlier (or 4NT if 4♠ would be RKCB).
If Doubler had a regular old RKCB hand, he would presumably bid whichever of 4NT or 4♦ (or 4♠) is RKCB.
3♠ did not unambiguously agree clubs, as it might have been seeking 3NT, but it unambiguously excluded any other strain except clubs or notrump, IMO.

Thus, 4NT is Last Train. Clubs agreed.



"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#11 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2012-July-17, 18:07

Since I play equal level conversion as non-forcing (eg ♠xx AQxx AQTxx Jx) and a raise to 4♣ as forcing (>>>> better than non-forcing), then I would typically have a good 0463 hand.

What does one do with a non-forcing raise to 4♣? Well, usually just bid 5, but alternatively bid 3♠ intending to Pass 3NT or 4♣. In this scheme, partner's retreat to 4♣ shows a non-descript minimum with no stop.

So it's a lone vote for "scramble".
0

#12 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-July-17, 20:23

Slam try although when partner holds a moose the natural reaction is to cue and not barge into RKC.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#13 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2012-July-17, 21:20

4NT is keycard, imo. That's what ch00 tells me.
Kevin Fay
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users