I agree.. this is not a 2♥ overcall. Simple as that, although I would double 1♠.
Ben
First board of the night
#22
Posted 2004-November-18, 16:51
Quote
QUOTE (flytoox @ Nov 18 2004, 12:01 PM)
Dealer: North
Vul: E/W
Scoring: Unknown
♠
♥ AQxxx
♦ Kxxx
♣ Qxxx
Hum.. I prefer to double 1S here. Heck even the_hog would probably double this
Dealer: North
Vul: E/W
Scoring: Unknown
♠
♥ AQxxx
♦ Kxxx
♣ Qxxx
Hum.. I prefer to double 1S here. Heck even the_hog would probably double this
OK, so you'd rather he had...
♠
♥ AQxxxx
♦ Kxxx
♣ Qxx
You're still down 300, so what? Or do you double even with this hand?
Assuming partner has a spade void and ♥AQxxxx, which seems likely from the bidding, what do you think partner has that will allow you to make 4♥ or 3NT? Partner looks to have 7 cards outside of hearts and at most one winner in them. You have two discards for them in spades. That's still four losers.
#23
Posted 2004-November-18, 17:59
i'd have doubled with that hand, partner will tell me how good he is.... over 2s he can bid 2nt to show weakness (i bid 3c then), and any other bid is forcing... do people still play this?
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#24
Posted 2004-November-18, 19:05
jtfanclub, on Nov 18 2004, 11:51 PM, said:
OK, so you'd rather he had...
♠
♥ AQxxxx
♦ Kxxx
♣ Qxx
You're still down 300, so what? Or do you double even with this hand?
Assuming partner has a spade void and ♥AQxxxx, which seems likely from the bidding, what do you think partner has that will allow you to make 4♥ or 3NT? Partner looks to have 7 cards outside of hearts and at most one winner in them. You have two discards for them in spades. That's still four losers.
♠
♥ AQxxxx
♦ Kxxx
♣ Qxx
You're still down 300, so what? Or do you double even with this hand?
Assuming partner has a spade void and ♥AQxxxx, which seems likely from the bidding, what do you think partner has that will allow you to make 4♥ or 3NT? Partner looks to have 7 cards outside of hearts and at most one winner in them. You have two discards for them in spades. That's still four losers.
So what..? What if he had
--
AQxxxx
Axxx
xxx
Good play for 3NT. I can never tell one from the other, so I bid game. It's imps and vuln after all, so..
#25
Posted 2004-November-18, 20:10
whereagles, on Nov 18 2004, 08:05 PM, said:
So what..? What if he had
--
AQxxxx
Axxx
xxx
Good play for 3NT.
--
AQxxxx
Axxx
xxx
Good play for 3NT.
It has no play for 3NT whatsoever unless your opponents are kind enough to lead a spade from Kxxxx(x) when you've shown multiple stoppers. You have 8 tricks, and no hope for a 9th before they run clubs.
#26
Posted 2004-November-19, 08:43
luke warm, on Nov 18 2004, 11:59 PM, said:
i'd have doubled with that hand, partner will tell me how good he is.... over 2s he can bid 2nt to show weakness (i bid 3c then), and any other bid is forcing... do people still play this?
I at last do, we call this lebenshol
#27
Posted 2004-November-19, 12:44
yeah, it's based on leb... so many conventions are that it makes me thing leb might be the best convention ever
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)

Help
