2♦= ♥ 1 suiter.
Would you make a move? Something extrange is going on...
#2
Posted 2004-November-13, 09:35
The hearts block. You'd be better off with AKx.
Doesn't matter- I would never X. Dummy's likely bid 3NT with a long minor he's hoping to run. Doubling gives a possibility of them shifting to 5m which will likely make.
#3
Posted 2004-November-13, 11:05
If it is supposed to show a stop, I'm doubling. If RHO runs after LHO says it shows a stop, I call the cops. I think pard has an entry or two, even if they have their expected combined 25-26, so they are not running 9 tricks here.
No reason to think 3N is 'gambling' here.
#5
Posted 2004-November-13, 12:17
#6
Posted 2004-November-13, 13:27
#7
Posted 2004-November-13, 14:16
My guess is partner has 6 card spade suit and short heart.
Just kidding i wouldnt dare to bid 4S just pass and hope for best.
#8
Posted 2004-November-13, 15:09
#11
Posted 2004-November-13, 17:00
#12
Posted 2004-November-13, 19:02
Fluffy, on Nov 14 2004, 12:02 AM, said:
if that case i might not bid 4♥... much rather find some way to make you declarer
#13
Posted 2004-November-14, 08:39
Fluffy, on Nov 13 2004, 03:20 PM, said:
N - E - S - W
ps -ps -ps -1NT
2♦*-3NT-??
2♦= ♥ 1 suiter.
I can clearly see what the problem is: you have only 12 cards. My move is to call the TD, and get 60% if one of my opps has 14 cards
#14
Posted 2004-November-14, 10:09
Free, on Nov 14 2004, 09:39 AM, said:
Fluffy, on Nov 13 2004, 03:20 PM, said:
N - E - S - W
ps -ps -ps -1NT
2♦*-3NT-??
2♦= ♥ 1 suiter.
I can clearly see what the problem is: you have only 12 cards. My move is to call the TD, and get 60% if one of my opps has 14 cards
Lol you are always the one to find this, i think it got something to do with the phtographics abilities we talked about at other thread.
#15
Posted 2004-November-14, 15:23
I overlooked the ♣7 :-(
These was the full hand:
Not only the 4♥ was getting a top with -500, but also doinganything else was leading to a bottom, everyone made -630 after ♥ lead, but your clever partner didn´t feel any need on leading such worthless suit if you passed and led wich at start looked promising ♠9 for -660.
#16
Posted 2004-November-14, 21:05
Fluffy, on Nov 14 2004, 04:23 PM, said:
OK, now one of you experts explain to me why they can't make 5 diamonds.
#17
Posted 2004-November-14, 21:42
jtfanclub, on Nov 14 2004, 07:05 PM, said:
Fluffy, on Nov 14 2004, 04:23 PM, said:
|
|
OK, now one of you experts explain to me why they can't make 5 diamonds.
....or 4N, 5♣ and 4♠
#18
Posted 2004-November-14, 21:57
#19
Posted 2004-November-15, 07:01
#20
Posted 2004-November-15, 10:00
If he says 'denies a stopper' you double. They will probably play 4♦ (-150) or 5♦ (-600) which is a top.
If he says 'shows a stopper' you bid 4♥. You will have been misinformed though, dunno what the consequence will be but can not be worse for us than the actual score.

Help

N - E - S - W
ps -ps -ps -1NT
2♦*-3NT-??