I liked my 3♥ bid, but GIB chose to double with the North hand. What are GIB's criteria for differentiating between the two bids?
http://tinyurl.com/7uoqc8r
http://tinyurl.com/8329aqc
Page 1 of 1
Overcalling their Jacoby transfer
#2
Posted 2012-May-01, 09:40
I prefer your call cause it puts more pressure on the opponents
x should be more a hand where you show that suit and likely hood of playing in another
cue bid should be 3 suit take out
too many times playing with GIB you can really bid your suit over 1NT and what it does is it
leaves a transfer or way of opps showing their suits at a lower level, thats why GIBs crappelletti system
is so unworkable.
x should be more a hand where you show that suit and likely hood of playing in another
cue bid should be 3 suit take out
too many times playing with GIB you can really bid your suit over 1NT and what it does is it
leaves a transfer or way of opps showing their suits at a lower level, thats why GIBs crappelletti system
is so unworkable.
#3
Posted 2012-May-01, 09:50
when did this result happen , did a search in my hands for both you and kibbeh and couldnt find the hand
i was curious about the results I would imagine 4♥-1 would be avg plus plus
i was curious about the results I would imagine 4♥-1 would be avg plus plus
#4
Posted 2012-May-01, 09:56
It happened this morning in MBC, but I left the table before this hand had been played 16 times in my scoring group (it had been played 15 times) so the hand didn't make it to myhands. Yes, most tables were EW 3S= for 140, so I gained a little.
#5
Posted 2012-May-01, 11:13
Bbradley62, on 2012-May-01, 09:56, said:
It happened this morning in MBC, but I left the table before this hand had been played 16 times in my scoring group (it had been played 15 times) so the hand didn't make it to myhands. Yes, most tables were EW 3S= for 140, so I gained a little.
Ok, thanks was curious about the result
but def like your 3♥ call better than the double
Page 1 of 1

Help
