BBO Discussion Forums: Should we find slam? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Should we find slam? Teams

#1 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-April-03, 16:38



Should West make an extra effort to find 6?
0

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-April-03, 16:47

west should bid 4 wich is free, 6 is cold opposite AQ A and doubleton heart wich is a pretty normal holding
0

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,855
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2012-April-03, 16:49

I have sympathy for West's decision, but I think his hand is worth 4. That might not be enough.....but East surely has a good hand in context at that juncture. He can visualize a stiff spade, and now say x Axxx KQxxxx Kx is enough....so he should make a 5 call, and it's over the West again.

I think it is biddable, but both players (especially West on the 3rd round) have to be glass half-full bidders, rather than glass half-empty.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,739
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-April-03, 17:55

agree west should bid 4s which makes it easier for east to jump to 6d

in any event perfect hands with perfect fits and low pt count so not easy to bid slam.
0

#5 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2012-April-03, 18:50

Also, agree that at least 4 should be bid by West on the way to 5 .
0

#6 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-April-04, 05:13

Also chalk me up for a 4S bid. The good raise by East should have West thinking about slam.

ahydra
0

#7 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2012-April-04, 08:15

If East makes a 4H!-jump-cue Splinter over 2S, then West knowing that shortness-opposite-other shortness generates lots of tricks, might be more inclined to go to 6D .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#8 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-April-04, 11:58

View PostTWO4BRIDGE, on 2012-April-04, 08:15, said:

If East makes a 4H!-jump-cue Splinter over 2S, then West knowing that shortness-opposite-other shortness generates lots of tricks, might be more inclined to go to 6D .


I was planning to splinter with 3, but North's 2 spoiled that plan. I didn't think I could justify a 4 splinter, so I just bid 3.

I notice a lot of support for 4 from West, but is 4 not better? It leaves East room to cue 4 before West cues 4.
0

#9 User is offline   phil_20686 

  • Scotland
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,754
  • Joined: 2008-August-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 2012-April-05, 03:59

View PostQuartic, on 2012-April-04, 11:58, said:

I was planning to splinter with 3, but North's 2 spoiled that plan. I didn't think I could justify a 4 splinter, so I just bid 3.

I notice a lot of support for 4 from West, but is 4 not better? It leaves East room to cue 4 before West cues 4.


The problem with 4C is it feels natural, helping partner decide what to do in a competitive auction, rather than any kind of slam move or cue bid. I would guess most would bid 4c here with a hand like (12)AKxxx QJxxx if that is not a micheals for you and similar. or a bunch of 6-4 hands with a trick source in clubs.

4S and 4H are unambigously slam moves. I prefer 4H, as if partner doesnt have a spade control, then I can now drive a slam pretty much. If he does, I can still bid 5c, and give partner another chance.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users