BBO Discussion Forums: What's you bidding style on this hand - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What's you bidding style on this hand Poll

Poll: What's you bidding style on this hand (26 member(s) have cast votes)

What would you bid here?

  1. 1 H (9 votes [34.62%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 34.62%

  2. 3 H (5 votes [19.23%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 19.23%

  3. 4 H (12 votes [46.15%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 46.15%

  4. other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Aberlour10 

  • Vugrapholic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,018
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:At the Rhine River km 772,1

Posted 2012-March-24, 17:30

Both VUL, matchpoints, following hand in 2nd seat, what do you prefer to bid ... PASS-???


Preempts are Aberlour's best bridge friends
0

#2 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2012-March-25, 00:39

3 -- 2nd seat preempts should more conservative because the opponents are less likely to have game with 1st seat passing. The hand is exactly what partner would picture it to be. So partner is unlikely to go wrong in any decisions he/she makes.
1

#3 User is offline   Aberlour10 

  • Vugrapholic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,018
  • Joined: 2004-January-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:At the Rhine River km 772,1

Posted 2012-March-25, 06:39

View Postrmnka447, on 2012-March-25, 00:39, said:

3 -- 2nd seat preempts should more conservative because the opponents are less likely to have game with 1st seat passing. The hand is exactly what partner would picture it to be. So partner is unlikely to go wrong in any decisions he/she makes.


I see, but this void in diamonds seems to be worth for me to upgrade this preempt to 4 , anyway most would prefer 1H, I suppose.
Preempts are Aberlour's best bridge friends
0

#4 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-March-25, 06:50

I like 1 or 4.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#5 User is offline   BunnyGo 

  • Lamentable Bunny
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,505
  • Joined: 2008-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 2012-March-25, 07:16

View Postgwnn, on 2012-March-25, 06:50, said:

I like 1 or 4.


I agree, but the above statement about second seat preempts being sounder is true. This hand just strikes me as good enough to open at the 1 level. I don't hate 4, but would bid 1.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34

Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
0

#6 User is offline   mich-b 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 584
  • Joined: 2008-November-27

Posted 2012-March-25, 08:14

Would open 4.
For us this is a "prototype" 4 opening.
0

#7 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-March-25, 13:27

View Postrmnka447, on 2012-March-25, 00:39, said:

3 -- 2nd seat preempts should more conservative because the opponents are less likely to have game with 1st seat passing. The hand is exactly what partner would picture it to be. So partner is unlikely to go wrong in any decisions he/she makes.

Partner will picture at most the same heart suit in a 7222 shape. In practice, this hand will very often be a trick better than that because partner will have a stray queen or jack in a black suit that he doesn't consider very useful.
0

#8 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-March-25, 19:11

View Postnigel_k, on 2012-March-25, 13:27, said:

Partner will picture at most the same heart suit in a 7222 shape. In practice, this hand will very often be a trick better than that because partner will have a stray queen or jack in a black suit that he doesn't consider very useful.

That's fine, it gives us some extra chance of actually making [4]. With the same suit in a 7222 I might start with 1.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
1

#9 User is offline   HighLow21 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 2012-January-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-March-25, 19:17

3 at matchpoints; 1 or 4 at IMPs.
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
0

#10 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-March-26, 00:50

Surprised no one has yet mentioned 3NT yet.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#11 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-March-26, 06:17

View Postgwnn, on 2012-March-26, 00:50, said:

Surprised no one has yet mentioned 3NT yet.


I have one partner with which I play a gambling 3NT in any suit - this would be an ideal hand to use it on.

Not playing that, I'd open 4H.

ahydra
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users