BBO Discussion Forums: LAs? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

LAs?

#21 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2012-February-17, 14:43

View PostTrinidad, on 2012-February-17, 06:47, said:

Not for me, but the auction would continue:

1N (2D) P (2S)
P (3C)1 P (3H)2
P (4H)3 Dbl4 P5

View Postgnasher, on 2012-February-17, 12:56, said:

I agree with most of this, but wouldn't 3♥ be FSF?

I actually had thought about that, before I posted. You certainly could play it as FSF, but my gut feeling says that you should play it as natural. I don't play FSF in competition since I have a cue available. In my mind, a hand that would have bid FSF now, should have 'cued' 2NT the round before. This leaves 3♥ as natural: Pick a major partner, any major.

Obviously this is very academic since I haven't played natural overcalls after 1NT for ages. And I could easily be wrong.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users