Capp
#1
Posted 2012-February-09, 20:59
#3
Posted 2012-February-09, 23:22
#4
Posted 2012-February-10, 00:23
#5
Posted 2012-February-10, 03:06
Bbradley62, on 2012-February-09, 20:59, said:
You have strange ideas about how often you "should" be doing it. I open 1NT on hands which are a lot further away from an old-fashioned 1NT than this.
Bbradley62, on 2012-February-09, 23:22, said:
Yes, you are hopelessly old-fashioned, and GIB's system is just stupid. The bid should always show 5+ spades and a 4+ minor, not the other way around.
-- Bertrand Russell
#6
Posted 2012-February-10, 13:41
Bbradley62, on 2012-February-09, 23:22, said:
I think GIB's explanation means that it can be 4/5 either way. i.e. the 4+S means that it might have 4S (in which case it has 5m) or it might have 5S (in which case it might only have 4m)
#9
Posted 2012-February-11, 23:57
The response to 2N just shows its better minor. It claims to be 5+, but since the 2♠ bid didn't actually require a 5-card minor, it isn't necessarily. I'm not sure why it says that, unless the rule for Capp was changed and they forgot to fix the followon to match it. It should just say "biddable C".
#10
Posted 2012-February-13, 12:33
Bbradley62, on 2012-February-09, 20:59, said:
#11
Posted 2012-February-13, 13:55
But for whatever reason, Capp has always been the popular choice among the online hoi poloi, so it makes sense for GIB to play it.
Note that the requirement that both suits be at least biddable means that they'll often be 5 cards. A 4-card suit has to be headed by A, KQ, KJ, or 3 of 5 honors to be biddable. I wonder what the odds are of holding one of these 4-card suits is when an opponent has opened strong NT.
#12
Posted 2012-February-13, 20:15
barmar, on 2012-February-13, 13:55, said:
Back when random pickups actually had some modicum of system discussion, this may have been true, and even then only among Americans. Nowadays "undiscussed" seems to be the big favourite.
-- Bertrand Russell

Help
