BBO Discussion Forums: 2/9 decisions IV - 5 leveled - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2/9 decisions IV - 5 leveled

#1 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-February-10, 01:36

r/w

♠AJ5x ♥AQx ♦Ax ♣KJTx

1♣ - (3♦) - x - (5♦)
?

FWIW, a natural 2♦ is not available for this pair
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#2 User is offline   dwar0123 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 770
  • Joined: 2011-September-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bellevue, WA

Posted 2012-February-10, 01:53

If my majors were equal I think I would bid 6♦, but they are not, so 6♠.
1

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2012-February-10, 03:23

6S might look a little silly when partner is 3415, although it could still be a fine contract.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2012-February-10, 07:48

I'll just dbl. If pard pulls, I'll jump it. Otherwise I'm fine playing this dbled.
0

#5 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-February-10, 08:29

Depends what X is. I play it as negative - so partner can have as few as say 8 points with 4+ hearts, in which case I'll X.

ahydra
1

#6 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2012-February-10, 08:44

DBL and i dont think it is close to bidding on eventhough i know the result of this board.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#7 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-February-10, 09:52

Double. I am going plus in 5♦x. Anything else is just a guess.
0

#8 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-February-10, 11:40

double by now
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#9 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-February-11, 23:31

I don't like double at these colours, but maybe that is best. At least it shows values and partner can do something if they want.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
0

#10 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-February-12, 00:52

We have an extremely likely slam and we are vulnerable against not, I don't understand double. I mean our diamonds are Ax opposite a very likely stiff, and partner showed values. I would try 5N.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
3

#11 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2012-February-12, 03:29

I choosed to DBL 5♦ because i wld dbl 3♦ with all these hands below. Most of them has slim chance in slam except. But these are the hands pd has a stiff ♦, there will be some hands where he has 2 of them if 3♦ bidder is agressive at these colors. But i wont construct hands with xx ♦.

KQxx
Jxxx
x
Qxxx Needs not to lose a ♥ + 3-2 ♠ or may go down simply by a ruff in 6♣ about %9.2 ?

Qxxx
KJxx
x
Qxxx Needs not to lose a ♠ about % 17

xxxx
KJxx
x
AQxx Needs to lose only 1 ♠ AJxx vs xxxx

Qxxx
Jxxx
x
AQxx Needs to not lose 2 tricks in majors

KQxx
KJxx
x
xxxx Needs ♣ Q on and 3-2 ♠ or 4-2 ♥ so they wont get a ruff.

Kxx
KJxx
x
Qxxxx Needs ♠ finesse and no surprise ruff.

Kxxxx
AQx
x
Qxxx Needs trump Q finesse/drop and no ♣ ruff in 6 ♠, or in 6♣ probably needs 2-2 ♠.

Txx
KJTx
x
AQxxx Needs to lose only 1♠ Txx vs AJxx

Justin when u see the original hand u will laugh too. Other table made slam but they literally had to not lose 2♠ from AJ76 vs 98xx but that wasnt enough to make slam they also needed to find 2 way finesse ♣ Q.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#12 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-February-13, 06:51

Despite the holdings which makes slam bad, I do not want to wrirte down just 300 or 500, so I join Justins 5 NT.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#13 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-February-15, 09:28

We doubled and settled for a small plus against 5♦. Partner held 98xx KJTxx x Axx. The other table bid 6♥ which needs a little luck - I do not remember the auction, but I know that LHO did not preempt on Q x T9xxxx Q9xxx.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users