11 card fit with RHO
#1
Posted 2012-February-07, 03:00
♠AQT975
♥KQ65
♦JT4
♣-
Assuming you pass (please let me know if you don't), LHO bids the expected 1NT and partner doubles (takeout for spades), RHO passes. Your call?
#2
Posted 2012-February-07, 04:52
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2012-February-07, 05:40
#4
Posted 2012-February-07, 08:39
#5
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:13
#6
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:23
What do you do if the auction goes:
(1S) P (1N) X
(P) P (2D) P
(P) ?
(1S) P (1N) X
(P) P (XX) P [XX = SOS]
(2D) ?
Obv we FP (right?) if LHO SOS's and RHO bids clubs, and we bid 2H if LHO balances clubs and partner FP's
But when they bid diamonds, I'm wondering if "rip it, lead trump" is reasonable, or whether it's better to bid toward our own heart game. At w/r, I'm more inclined to speculatively rip it, and at r/w, I'm less likely, but I'm not sure what to do at even.
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#7
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:28
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#8
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:28
wyman, on 2012-February-07, 09:23, said:
What do you do if the auction goes:
(1S) P (1N) X
(P) P (2D) P
(P) ?
(1S) P (1N) X
(P) P (XX) P [XX = SOS]
(2D) ?
Obv we FP (right?) if LHO SOS's and RHO bids clubs, and we bid 2H if LHO balances clubs and partner FP's
But when they bid diamonds, I'm wondering if "rip it, lead trump" is reasonable, or whether it's better to bid toward our own heart game. At w/r, I'm more inclined to speculatively rip it, and at r/w, I'm less likely, but I'm not sure what to do at even.
For the first I would dble, but in my case it would be t/o not penalty, and delighted for partner to pass it. If he bids hearts I will raise to at least 3H.
In the second, I would make a t/o double hoping that partner will pass. If partner bids Clubs I will correct to 4H. This is natural for me over 3 or 4 clubs, as one often makes t/o doubles when you already know the right contract if it is not 2x x.
#9
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:29
wyman, on 2012-February-07, 09:28, said:
I can, its the double and the old bid your shortage, if they wind you run to 2h cause you are 5503 and thought you would be obnoxious.....
Also when partner raises his eyebrow in his best impersonation of spock you can calmly announce that you wanted a diamond lead.
#10
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:30
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#11
Posted 2012-February-07, 09:35
wyman, on 2012-February-07, 09:30, said:
Sure, at the FP stage they are symmetrical treatments. Partner has to pass instead of double, or double instead of pass, however, I have found that the t/o treatement works better once you go past the forcing stage. For me I play FP here only up to and including two diamonds. This means we always have the option to pass out 2h undoubled. This can often be the best you can do on the board. I dont mind doubling into 180 or 280, but being forced to double them into game because my best suit is spades has never appealed to me.
Other than that its my meta agreement for these "value showing, desire to penalise X" that afterwards the first double reverts to t/o. So this applies when you double micheals and penalties, or a multi type bid over your 1N etc.