BBO Discussion Forums: 1h-1s-4h - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1h-1s-4h meaning

#21 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-February-02, 12:35

View PostBbradley62, on 2012-February-02, 12:33, said:

Are these tools frequently employed by B/I players?

Luckily, not LTC. :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#22 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-February-02, 12:58

View PostBbradley62, on 2012-February-02, 12:33, said:

Are these tools frequently employed by B/I players?

Not at the table, hopefully. But they certainly can be used as a guide or source for post mortems or for study of the decision making process.

There are actually folks whose bidding system is designed solely on the LTC principle, but I certainly don't recommend it.

KNR
ODR
LTC
LTT

and others are concepts/tools for judging the value of a hand in battle, not really meant to be styles or system methods in and of themselves.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#23 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-February-02, 16:42

View Postgwnn, on 2012-February-02, 03:29, said:

Didn't you use to play this as a strong two-ish hand?


Hah, yes this was actually some massive knowledge hole that I had that was outted on the forums. I posted once that I thought 4H showed a hand like Phil suggested, and it became apparent that I was wrong, and then I asked my real life friends also and they had the same reaction as phil had to phil in this thread ("Are you retarded jlall?"). Obv I would just jumpshift now with a hand like that. Gwnn if you could find that thread I would be happy :)
0

#24 User is offline   Flem72 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 505
  • Joined: 2011-March-04

Posted 2012-February-03, 08:22

View Postphil_20686, on 2012-February-02, 11:35, said:

Indeed, it came across with the Romans courtesy of Hellenic Medicine. It was one of the oldest stable spellings in the English Language before you corrupted it :(.


Older than "neighbour"?
0

#25 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2012-February-04, 09:29

View PostBbradley62, on 2012-February-02, 12:33, said:

Are these tools frequently employed by B/I players?


Hmm, difficult question. The people who use these tools usually don't describe themselves as B/I.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#26 User is offline   HighLow21 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 2012-January-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-February-09, 00:42

View Postaguahombre, on 2012-February-01, 17:36, said:

Opener (you) seem to be showing a hand with 7 hearts and a KNR of around 19.

5C now, as responder would be fine, and let partner make the next mistake. I don't like the 1S response with L.R. in hearts and everything but spade values, but that wasn't asked.


I was just about to say this --> the 1 bid is unnecessary and misleading. I'd make another move but I'm not sure I would go on to slam if I found out we were missing a keycard.
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users