BBO Discussion Forums: invitational bid missing? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

invitational bid missing?

#1 User is offline   calm01 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 2010-July-08

Posted 2012-January-03, 19:46

http://tinyurl.com/6oh2pqk

When partner has limited their hand by a 1 1NT rebid, surely you require a jump repeat of a major suit at the 3 level to be invitational not forcing.

I assume 2S would be a weak sign-off, 4S unilateral game bid - also a sign-off, so it appears to require 3S to be invitational. There are other forcing bids available if required.

Have I missed something?
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-January-04, 08:55

Clearly 3 should be invitational.

I have seen other auctions in which I have a long minor, 3NT is not a possibility, and I have no way of bidding game without showing a monster. If I jump to 5 of my minor I am showing 25 HCP (it is amazing how many bids show 25 HCP in GIB's system) and if I bid 4 of my minor (not a jump) I am inviting game. There is no in between bid. So every minor suit auction becomes a 4 or 6 hand.
0

#3 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,422
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-January-05, 04:35

GIB's explanation of 2 in this auction is: 6+ S; 8-12 total points. This is a wide range, but then North can invite if he's max for his 1NT. It would be a weak signoff if East hadn't interfered.

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users