Ride the roller coaster.
#1
Posted 2004-October-20, 08:04
QJ
xxx
void
KJTxxxxx - yes 8 of them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1H (P) 2H (4D)
4H (P) P (4S)
P (P) ?
I bid 1H
Firstly, do you agree with 2H? OK I don't but seriously unless you play a Ben like structure, is there a "real" alternative? (We do play a forcing nt). Personally I would bid that, but....
My pass of 4S is forcing, now what do you bid. Please don't disappoint me.
#2
Posted 2004-October-20, 08:11
Freiherr von der Steiermark.
Minnesaenger
#3
Posted 2004-October-20, 08:13
foole me twice, shame on me....!!
#4
Posted 2004-October-20, 08:15
#5
Posted 2004-October-20, 08:29
foole me twice, shame on me....!!
#6
Posted 2004-October-20, 08:33
#7
Posted 2004-October-20, 10:10
#8
Posted 2004-October-20, 10:26
1N for me.
#9
Posted 2004-October-20, 11:31
Hongjun
#10
Posted 2004-October-20, 12:15
The_Hog, on Oct 20 2004, 02:04 PM, said:
QJ
xxx
void
KJTxxxxx - yes 8 of them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1H (P) 2H (4D)
4H (P) P (4S)
P (P) ?
I bid 1H
Firstly, do you agree with 2H? OK I don't but seriously unless you play a Ben like structure, is there a "real" alternative? (We do play a forcing nt). Personally I would bid that, but....
My pass of 4S is forcing, now what do you bid. Please don't disappoint me.
2H is bad. The right bid here is 1NT. Later you can introduce your clubs at some level. How many clubs you bid is no science though.
#11
Posted 2004-October-21, 04:01
The_Hog, on Oct 20 2004, 02:33 PM, said:
That canīt be possible since I am bidding 5♥ myself
over 5♠ I double, I donīt wanna play a contract I cannot make unless partner has ♣Ax adn ♣ are divided.
#12
Posted 2004-October-21, 06:57
The_Hog, on Oct 20 2004, 02:04 PM, said:
QJ
xxx
void
KJTxxxxx - yes 8 of them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1H (P) 2H (4D)
4H (P) P (4S)
P (P) ?
I bid 1H
Firstly, do you agree with 2H? OK I don't but seriously unless you play a Ben like structure, is there a "real" alternative? (We do play a forcing nt). Personally I would bid that, but....
My pass of 4S is forcing, now what do you bid. Please don't disappoint me.
I tend to treat 3 card support with a void in a similar manner as 4 card support with a singleton.
So here I would use a mixed 4 card raise, whichever is allowed by the system: e.g. a Bergen 3♣ (6-9) or a FitShowing Jump 3♣.
Fitshowing jump has the big flaw of wasted side QJ.
What I would not use is the raise to 2♥, which in my opinion:
1) should be less unbalanced
2) should have more HCP if 1NT forcing is in use (<8 hcp 3 card raise would go via 1NT)
I believe the problems after opps competing to 4S are consequence of 2H.
Two more question:
1) is opener's hand limited (e.g. strong club framework or alike) ?
2) is it not risky to agree forcing pass on a sequence where, after all, responder has only suggested non-invitational value ?
#13
Posted 2004-October-21, 16:24
#14
Posted 2004-October-27, 09:16
By the way I am not sure I want to play this in 4♥ anyway. 5♣ likely to play better.
What if partner has:
♠Kxx
♥ AKxxxx
♦KJx
♣Q
how often is 4♥ making? 5♣ on the other hand is cold unless they find a heart ruff.
By the way I don't think that is partner's hand if he made a forcing pass of 4♠ as with that hand he'd clearly double.
#15
Posted 2004-October-27, 12:50

Help
