North and South use 1/2 system and XYZ convention
North
♠A53
♥Q764
♦AQ97
♣53
South
♠KJ64
♥K85
♦5
♣AJ864
N S
1♦ 1♠
1NT ?
North open bid 1♦,South bid 1♠,North bid 1NT,what should South bid now?
Page 1 of 1
XYZ convention,1/2,4Hearts and 5Clubs,invention
#2
Posted 2011-December-18, 01:40
2♣, planning to invite in NT but the director will be called when the opps discover you both have Q♥
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
(still learning)
"At last: just calm down, this kind of disrupted boards happens every day in our bridge community. It will always be an inherent part of bridge until we move to a modern platform, and then will we have other hopefully less frequent issues." P Swennson
(still learning)
"At last: just calm down, this kind of disrupted boards happens every day in our bridge community. It will always be an inherent part of bridge until we move to a modern platform, and then will we have other hopefully less frequent issues." P Swennson
#3
Posted 2011-December-18, 02:30
3nt.
South has 12 high cards and a decent 5 card minor suit. North opened the other minor and rebid nt. It is possible that you have a 9 card ♣ fit, but you are going to have right around 25 points or so, which makes club game or slam less likely than 3nt.
South has 12 high cards and a decent 5 card minor suit. North opened the other minor and rebid nt. It is possible that you have a 9 card ♣ fit, but you are going to have right around 25 points or so, which makes club game or slam less likely than 3nt.
#4
Posted 2011-December-18, 06:36
clear 2nt if natural. otherwise 2c 2d then 2nt which I would do with a bal hand and 5s.
some play it as artificial in xyz some dont.
some play it as artificial in xyz some dont.
#6
Posted 2011-December-19, 04:26
I don't get the 3NT bidders. If this hand is a GF opposite a minimum opening bid then we should have responded 2C. That the given response is 1S, we can assume the OP opens light enough that this is wrong. Hence our systemic NT invite seems clear.
(-: Zel :-)
#7
Posted 2011-December-19, 07:16
I don't think it's that straight forward. We might not hold GF opposite some unbalanced minimum opening. (Ie. many hands with 6♦)
But balanced hands we open might be sound enough, always 12 or so that we want to GF now.
That said, I'd invite but with better spots I would start with 1♠ but bid 3NT now.
But balanced hands we open might be sound enough, always 12 or so that we want to GF now.
That said, I'd invite but with better spots I would start with 1♠ but bid 3NT now.
#8
Posted 2011-December-19, 07:22
What is a 1/2 system?
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#9
Posted 2011-December-19, 10:14
It's where you respond at the one level over opening bids at the two level. Or it's a system in which you have only half the agreements you need. Kind of like the ones I play with my regular partners.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
Page 1 of 1