BBO Discussion Forums: Should tourney entry be canceled when one plays in team game?? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Should tourney entry be canceled when one plays in team game?? Cancel entry OR sub offending player

Poll: CANCEL ENTRY or REPLACE SITOUT (11 member(s) have cast votes)

Cancel entry OR sub offending player?

  1. Cancel entry is the right (9 votes [81.82%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 81.82%

  2. Offending player can be replaced with sitout (2 votes [18.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   ksk2005 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15
  • Joined: 2007-April-30

  Posted 2013-January-16, 12:40

Several times my entry has been cancelled when my partner played at a another tourney , team game or disconnected. Would'nt be nice just replace the offending player with sitout and not punish the non-offending player?
0

#2 User is offline   diana_eva 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 5,168
  • Joined: 2009-July-26
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:bucharest / romania

Posted 2013-January-16, 13:37

View Postksk2005, on 2013-January-16, 12:40, said:

Several times my entry has been cancelled when my partner played at a another tourney , team game or disconnected. Would'nt be nice just replace the offending player with sitout and not punish the non-offending player?


You are asking about BBO tourneys right? Not live events.

I think it's your partner's responsibility to show up if he accepted to register for a tournament with you. I personally prefer to have my entry canceled if I can't play with a partner of my choice, rather than be swept away in tourney with a random sub. Not sure if this is how the majority feels, but I would guess this was the logic for the software to cancel a registration when one of the team members is not available.

#3 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,830
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2013-March-07, 09:21

View Postdiana_eva, on 2013-January-16, 13:37, said:

I personally prefer to have my entry canceled if I can't play with a partner of my choice, rather than be swept away in tourney with a random sub.

Perhaps you could implement this as an account option so that players can decide for themselves how such aborted entries are handled.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#4 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,398
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2013-March-07, 09:33

I don't think it should be an account option. BBO has a policy of avoiding too many options and this is clearly an option that can be missed. The orphaned partner can chose for himself to register with a robot or to try to find another p.

Starting the tourney with a sitout is a bad idea. Not only because the orphaned player might prefer not to play at all. But also because subs are scarse and tds are overloaded at the start of a tourney with the search for subs for players who are nonresponsive at the start of the tourney.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#5 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 22,061
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-March-07, 12:17

Subs are intended for situations where a player is unexpectedly disconnected during a tournament. Not showing up to play when the tourney starts is a different situation.

However, I suppose that in the case where your registered partner was just a random pickup, you would probably consider a sub just as good. But we can't currently distinguish between a regular partnership and a random hookup (maybe check whether the missing partner is a friend?).

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users