BBO Discussion Forums: ACBL Alert - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ACBL Alert May be short

#41 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-January-01, 16:28

AWM and RMB1 seem to have it right about the balanced hands, but not quite about the unbalanced ones, IMO.

5-6 with the shorter major, 4-5 in the minors, etc are just Bridge at the time of the opening bid...maybe an agreement about what a rebid shows needs alerting.

Responding 1M bypassing a longer minor is common as well, but later rebids by responder which show (for instance) 4-6 Mm would be alerted.

However, those are not the same as opening 1D with 3-5 or 2-5 in the minors. Those are the ones common sense requires an alert, if not the exact present wording of the regs in ACBL.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#42 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,251
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2012-January-03, 10:13

I disagree strongly about Precision 1D (even Precision 1D promising 3) being a canape system. There are *times* when they are opening their shorter minor, but they will open 1D with 1=4=4=4, and rebid clubs... They will open 1D with (13)=5=4 and rebid clubs...

2C doesn't *promise* longer clubs than diamonds, it (as I put it in my Alert) "doesn't encourage a preference". We don't bid our shorter suit first systemically, we bid diamonds first because we can't bid clubs - independent of the minors length.

Having said that, I *do* Alert the hands where partner "frequently has longer clubs than diamonds", and strongly think I should. However, I do play a "modern" 2+ 1D opener, so Announce that as well.
Long live the Republic-k. -- Major General J. Golding Frederick (tSCoSI)
0

#43 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2012-January-10, 07:42

What mycroft says is true. In England we have a definition of "possible canapé". A good example of this is in Blue Club per the original book, where the bidding sequence 1 1NT 2 shows an unbalanced hand, but either suit may be longer. However, the ACBL has "canapé" and otherwise: we have to fit things into that.

Now, if you are playing a natural system, whereby 1 2 2 shows spades as long or longer than hearts, and sometime you open 1 with



that is not a canapé system: that is just bridge. Partner will treat the spades as equal length or longer.

But a Precision 1 which may be a 1=4=3=5 is different: partner knows it is quite possibly canapé into clubs, perhaps "possible canapé" as mycroft plays it. But the important thing is not to have secrets from your opponents, so when 1 is opened, you should alert it if it shows 3+ and may have longer clubs in an unbalanced hand. As for a doubleton 1 opening there is no need to worry about canapé: opponents are warned about your methods by the announcement "may be short".

So please remember it is not a question of trying to describe things carefully for some sort of arbitrary classification, it is a question of keeping opponents informed.
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users