[calm01]

http://tinyurl.com/7rufkb2

This is a fundamental failure that occurs frequently and so is a high priority fix.

[cloa513]

calm01, on 2011-November-29, 05:29, said:

http://tinyurl.com/7rufkb2

This is a fundamental failure that occurs frequently and so is a high priority fix.

It don't why you call it that. Its a failure to set up a suit by defence.

[georgi]

Why declarer can't have ♣KJ62?

East still can have ♣AT and to play like that.

So having ♣75 (Declarer left with K6) might decide not risk to continue. Does it look like crucial mistake?

[barmar]

Even if this is high priority, it's also extremely hard to fix. There are no rules for GIB's defense, and there's no "understanding" of why partner is playing a certain way, it's all done by simulations.

While it's often correct to keep playing a suit partner has led, it's not a hard and fast rule. So I wouldn't want to program this into the code without some way for it to figure out if it's right.