BBO Discussion Forums: does nmf promise 5M? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

does nmf promise 5M?

#21 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,732
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-October-29, 17:37

 TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-October-29, 17:24, said:

Responder has a 9 loser hand... not worth a NMF bid after Opener shows a minimum even if s/he has 3 cards Sp :

1C - 1S
1NT ( 12-14 ) - 2D!
2H ( min, 4h, may have 3s ) - 2S ( 5s, no 4h, non-forcing )
pass


Agree, but I think I (North) should have corrected 3N to 4
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#22 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,836
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2011-October-30, 08:33

 jillybean, on 2011-October-29, 17:37, said:

Agree, but I think I (North) should have corrected 3N to 4

Why? What if Responder just had a big hand and was using nmf to avoid having to bid 4NT? Presumably the 3NT bidder thought that 2H also denied 3 spades whereas the 2H bidder thought you show the 4 hearts before 3 spades. FWiiW the simple (B/I) version of nmf is that bidding nmf followed by something else shows one hand type stronger than bidding the same thing directly. So 2S over 1NT would be weak and therefore nmf followed by 2S is just an invite. This is the style I would expect when a PUP agree nmf without further discussion.
(-: Zel :-)
1

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users