BBO Discussion Forums: No correction at the 6 level? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

No correction at the 6 level?

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2011-October-24, 14:57

Ignoring Lunatic's lunacy, since this is the GIB forum, shouldn't North correct to 6♠?
0

#2 User is offline   calm01 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 2010-July-08

Posted 2011-October-24, 15:53

Yes,

BUT...

only if GIB has built up a realistic view of Souths distribution.

Since GIB does not always give normal preference at the 2,3,4 or 5 level, why should the 6 level be different.

GIB does not appear build up a realistic picture of it partners distribution even when the bid descriptions of its partners bids make bridge sense.

Until GIB computes the length messages of it partners bidding this kind of behaviour will continue at all bidding levels. Consider it amusing that such a basic concept, so easy to program is without GIBs current programming.

calm01
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users