pooltuna, on 2011-October-04, 08:10, said:
I believe the meta agreement is if 2 suits are unknown then bidding one shows
That is indeed a common agreement. It does come with a simple problem, though: There is no bid for a strong hand that doesn't have a stopper in any of the suits and there are two ways to show stops in both suits.
Therefore, it is generally better to play that a cue asks for a stop, also in the case of two suiters:
- The cheapest cue asks for a stop in that suit, not saying anything about the other suit. (Partner cues the other suit to show a stop in the first and ask for a stop in the other.)
- A cue in the other suit asks for a stop and promises a stop in the suit that was skipped.
- 3NT shows stops in both suits.
This case is an obvious exception. The opponents have shown the majors and a preference to play in hearts. The stop in hearts is much more critical than the stop in spades. Therefore, 3
♠ asks for a stop in
hearts.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg