Help
Is this a bug or is GIB waiting a bid by me or opponents
Page 1 of 1
No bid by GIB
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 2011-July-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Helsinki
Posted 2011-September-29, 07:21
Is this a bug or is GIB waiting a bid by me or opponents
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 2011-July-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Helsinki
Posted 2011-September-29, 11:15
Another big pass.
Is GIB broken ?
#3
- Group: Yellows
- Posts: 1,317
- Joined: 2007-December-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Bulgaria
Posted 2011-September-29, 12:28
1st case looking buggy, but for the 2nd is different.
new suit introduced on 2nd level higher then the opening would be 14+TP which North doesn't have.
new suit lower then the opening would be 11+TP, but you've opened 1♣, and North has diamonds.
If the bidding was say: 1♦-1♥/♠ - with the same hand, but clubs suit, North will bid 2♣.
So it's not broken, just evaluated what will expose with its calls.
new suit introduced on 2nd level higher then the opening would be 14+TP which North doesn't have.
new suit lower then the opening would be 11+TP, but you've opened 1♣, and North has diamonds.
If the bidding was say: 1♦-1♥/♠ - with the same hand, but clubs suit, North will bid 2♣.
So it's not broken, just evaluated what will expose with its calls.
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 328
- Joined: 2010-November-11
Posted 2011-September-29, 13:17
This is simply not playable. I don't think any top players play this.
georgi, on 2011-September-29, 12:28, said:
1st case looking buggy, but for the 2nd is different.
new suit introduced on 2nd level higher then the opening would be 14+TP which North doesn't have.
new suit lower then the opening would be 11+TP, but you've opened 1♣, and North has diamonds.
If the bidding was say: 1♦-1♥/♠ - with the same hand, but clubs suit, North will bid 2♣.
So it's not broken, just evaluated what will expose with its calls.
new suit introduced on 2nd level higher then the opening would be 14+TP which North doesn't have.
new suit lower then the opening would be 11+TP, but you've opened 1♣, and North has diamonds.
If the bidding was say: 1♦-1♥/♠ - with the same hand, but clubs suit, North will bid 2♣.
So it's not broken, just evaluated what will expose with its calls.
#5
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 2011-July-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Helsinki
Posted 2011-September-29, 14:06
georgi, on 2011-September-29, 12:28, said:
1st case looking buggy, but for the 2nd is different.
new suit introduced on 2nd level higher then the opening would be 14+TP which North doesn't have.
new suit lower then the opening would be 11+TP, but you've opened 1♣, and North has diamonds.
If the bidding was say: 1♦-1♥/♠ - with the same hand, but clubs suit, North will bid 2♣.
So it's not broken, just evaluated what will expose with its calls.
new suit introduced on 2nd level higher then the opening would be 14+TP which North doesn't have.
new suit lower then the opening would be 11+TP, but you've opened 1♣, and North has diamonds.
If the bidding was say: 1♦-1♥/♠ - with the same hand, but clubs suit, North will bid 2♣.
So it's not broken, just evaluated what will expose with its calls.
It is strange that N must pass with nearly game forcing hand.
Why can't 2♦ be 11+TP and forcing for one round.
Page 1 of 1