FD CC Why isnt "pass" part of the available responses?
#1
Posted 2011-August-12, 09:43
Who can I contact (and how) to ask for this update?
Quote
#2
Posted 2011-August-12, 12:29
Anyway, I'm afraid there are no updates to FD forthcoming in the foreseeable future.
-- Bertrand Russell
#4
Posted 2011-August-12, 20:54
mgoetze, on 2011-August-12, 12:29, said:
Anyway, I'm afraid there are no updates to FD forthcoming in the foreseeable future.
OK, maybe I wasn't quite clear enough. Let's take a simple sequence;
1C - 1D;
1S - ??
Why is it, that at this point, responder's second round bid, there is no pass option for responder? The options start with 1N, etc., when they should really start with "pass" as the first option.
Quote
#5
Posted 2011-August-13, 03:26
-- Bertrand Russell
#6
Posted 2011-August-13, 05:05
mgoetze, on 2011-August-13, 03:26, said:
mmmm What if you are playing 'Mandatory' re-opening Doubles to catch opponents who overcall on Rubbish
e.g. 1♥ 1♠ Pass (forcing partner to re-open with a Double cos you hold the ♠
#7
Posted 2011-August-13, 08:57
fazzzoola, on 2011-August-12, 20:54, said:
1C - 1D;
1S - ??
Why is it, that at this point, responder's second round bid, there is no pass option for responder? The options start with 1N, etc., when they should really start with "pass" as the first option.
Click on constructive.
Pass will appear and u can write any meaning you want in the "PASS" bid..
#8
Posted 2011-August-14, 01:41
A2003, on 2011-August-13, 08:57, said:
Pass will appear and u can write any meaning you want in the "PASS" bid..
I did try that, alas, to no avail. No "pass" option at the top of the list.
Oh well... I guess I'll just have to learn to live with this shortcoming.
Thanks for trying.
Quote
#9
Posted 2011-August-14, 05:09
shintaro, on 2011-August-13, 05:05, said:
That's not very relevant if the opponents aren't bidding, which is how I understood the OP so far.
-- Bertrand Russell
#10
Posted 2011-August-14, 05:52
But sometimes it is not obvious what pass means and it would be nice if FD could explain it. For example:
2♣*-(dbl)-pass? *strong, artificial
does the pass say anything about clubs?
(1NT)-x-(2♦)-pass?
If x did not have the disposition "defend undoubled" (weird agreement, but for the sake of the argument) then it is clear that pass is forcing but even so it is not obvious what hands qualify for a forcing pass.
And if x did have the disposition "defend undoubled" then it is not even clear if pass is forcing or not since some pairs play that we can defend 2M undoubled but not 2m.

Help
