Help
♠AT532 ♥AKQ653 ♦K ♣3
Teams, r/w
1♥ - (dbl) - pass - (2♦);
2♠ - (3♦) - pass - (pass);
?
Agree with 2♠? Now what?
Nice 5-6
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,092
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2011-July-14, 17:00
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 662
- Joined: 2008-October-15
Posted 2011-July-14, 17:11
Pass I've shown my hand.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,247
- Joined: 2010-October-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Texas
Posted 2011-July-14, 17:28
jmcw, on 2011-July-14, 17:11, said:
Pass I've shown my hand.
3♠ would show your hand, but I'm afraid to do it "red" .... so pass for me too.
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,080
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2011-July-14, 17:29
I might have bid 4♦ instead of 2♠. 3♠ now.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#5
- Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,216
- Joined: 2008-December-04
- Gender:Male
- Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
- Interests:SLEEPING
Posted 2011-July-14, 17:45
3♥. I think the passers are crazy.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#6
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2011-July-14, 19:14
Obvious 3♥ bid IMO.
I could have bid 4♥ too but DBL by LHO slowed me down. About 2♠ bid ... it may help pd to figure how much he can help us, but on the other hand this stiff ♦ K makes me believe they can lead ♠ if i dont mention it at all, which would definetely be a great + in 3-4 ♥. Also mentioning ♠ makes it much easier for opponents to DBL and defend accurately if we are too high already.
I would never consider passing though.
I could have bid 4♥ too but DBL by LHO slowed me down. About 2♠ bid ... it may help pd to figure how much he can help us, but on the other hand this stiff ♦ K makes me believe they can lead ♠ if i dont mention it at all, which would definetely be a great + in 3-4 ♥. Also mentioning ♠ makes it much easier for opponents to DBL and defend accurately if we are too high already.
I would never consider passing though.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#7
- 5-level belongs to me
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,128
- Joined: 2004-August-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glasgow Scotland
- Interests:Poems Computers
Posted 2011-July-14, 19:20
Phil, on 2011-July-14, 17:00, said:
Teams, r/w. ♠AT532 ♥AKQ653 ♦K ♣3
1♥ - (dbl) - pass - (2♦);
2♠ - (3♦) - pass - (pass);
?
Agree with 2♠? Now what?
1♥ - (dbl) - pass - (2♦);
2♠ - (3♦) - pass - (pass);
?
Agree with 2♠? Now what?
3♠ = 10, Double = 9, 3♥ = 8, Pass = 7.
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2011-July-14, 20:43
I can't understand the passers. I would bid 3H which is far superior to 3S in my opinion.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#9
- Modern Day Trebuchet Enthusiast
-
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 738
- Joined: 2007-October-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Western Mass.
Posted 2011-July-14, 20:53
I still have AKQxxx of hearts, right?
(3♥)
(3♥)
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,092
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2011-July-14, 21:33
MrAce, on 2011-July-14, 19:14, said:
Obvious 3♥ bid IMO.
I could have bid 4♥ too but DBL by LHO slowed me down. About 2♠ bid ... it may help pd to figure how much he can help us, but on the other hand this stiff ♦ K makes me believe they can lead ♠ if i dont mention it at all, which would definetely be a great + in 3-4 ♥. Also mentioning ♠ makes it much easier for opponents to DBL and defend accurately if we are too high already.
I would never consider passing though.
I could have bid 4♥ too but DBL by LHO slowed me down. About 2♠ bid ... it may help pd to figure how much he can help us, but on the other hand this stiff ♦ K makes me believe they can lead ♠ if i dont mention it at all, which would definetely be a great + in 3-4 ♥. Also mentioning ♠ makes it much easier for opponents to DBL and defend accurately if we are too high already.
I would never consider passing though.
A club was led against 3♥.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#11
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 815
- Joined: 2009-August-31
Posted 2011-July-14, 23:32
3H is obvious IMO
Aaron Jones Unit 557
www.longbeachbridge.com
www.longbeachbridge.com
#12
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-July-15, 01:15
I must be getting old. I'd pass. I've already reversed at adverse, in a fairly dangerous auction. How much less than this can I have? In the context of having bid 2♠, my spades are awful, my hearts mediocre, and my minor-suit values useless.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#13
- 5555
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,516
- Joined: 2003-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-July-15, 01:20
Agree with Andy (except I know that I am getting old).
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#14
- mmm Duvel
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-July-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
- Interests:Duvel, Whisky
Posted 2011-July-15, 01:52
I would bid 3♥ and also don't understand the passers.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,739
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-July-15, 02:02
Phil, on 2011-July-14, 17:00, said:
♠AT532 ♥AKQ653 ♦K ♣3
Teams, r/w
1♥ - (dbl) - pass - (2♦);
2♠ - (3♦) - pass - (pass);
?
Agree with 2♠? Now what?
Teams, r/w
1♥ - (dbl) - pass - (2♦);
2♠ - (3♦) - pass - (pass);
?
Agree with 2♠? Now what?
no 2h
2h shows 6h and extras, not minimum.
pard seems to have close to nothing.
lho has spades.
both opp seem to have D.
-----
now pass I have overbid this hand enough.
#16
- 5555
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,516
- Joined: 2003-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-July-15, 02:32
What kind of hand from partner are the bidders hoping for?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#17
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 181
- Joined: 2010-October-26
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
- Interests:Origami, squash, table tennis, travelling
Posted 2011-July-15, 03:43
This hand doesn't seem strong enough to bid 3♠ with the poor ♠ suit and stiff K♦ when vul. Passing doesn't look great either with a 6-5 and suits headed by A and AKQ. 3♥ is what I'd go for.
#18
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,627
- Joined: 2009-November-30
- Location:Oxfordshire, England
Posted 2011-July-15, 04:49
mtvesuvius, on 2011-July-14, 17:45, said:
3♥. I think the passers are crazy.
MrAce, on 2011-July-14, 19:14, said:
Obvious 3♥ bid IMO.
I would never consider passing.
I would never consider passing.
the hog, on 2011-July-14, 20:43, said:
I can't understand the passers. I would bid 3H
etc, etc.
Oh dear, I can't really understand the bidders - is my judgment really that bad?
What do the bidders think partner will expect them to hold for their 2♠ bid? I do wonder whether those wanting to bid now are suggesting that they don't really trust their partner's judgment. Looking at it another way, I think this hand has a lot of losers unless partner has some sort of fit for the spades, which seems unlikely in view of the take-out double.
#19
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,962
- Joined: 2007-September-14
- Location:Australia
- Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.
Posted 2011-July-15, 08:28
My first instinct was pass since I have bid 1H and 2S all by myself at unfav didn't I?
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#20
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2011-July-15, 09:06
3♠. Come on, how often are you dealt a 65 with 4 losers?