BBO Discussion Forums: stoppers, partial stoppers and no stops at all - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

stoppers, partial stoppers and no stops at all

#1 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,625
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-June-12, 11:02

Link to hand

Is AJx really only good enough for "partial stopper at best". And is 8xx enough to cover a hand which promises what it did?
Wayne Somerville
0

#2 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,093
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-June-12, 12:53

They got it right?

GIB uses simulation, the alters in later auctions are not worth
a lot, I would say - they are correct right in theory, but ...
you see the result of the simulation.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#3 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-June-12, 14:43

432 is considered a partial stopper quite often.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#4 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2011-June-13, 08:06

Why not just 2NT, much better played by West although still has nearly no chance.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users