Shouldn't GIB bid 2♦ over 2♣? I expected him to have NT shape when he bid 2N.
Page 1 of 1
Bid after FSF
#1
Posted 2011-June-09, 21:37
Shouldn't GIB bid 2♦ over 2♣? I expected him to have NT shape when he bid 2N.
#2
Posted 2011-June-11, 07:05
In real life, I play that after fourth suit forcing, first priority is to show 3-card support for partner's major and second priority is to show a stopper. So GIB did fine by those rules.
Then again, in real life, I don't play this 2♣ bid as FSF...
Then again, in real life, I don't play this 2♣ bid as FSF...
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 2011-June-13, 08:22
mgoetze, on 2011-June-11, 07:05, said:
In real life, I play that after fourth suit forcing, first priority is to show 3-card support for partner's major and second priority is to show a stopper. So GIB did fine by those rules.
Then again, in real life, I don't play this 2♣ bid as FSF...
Then again, in real life, I don't play this 2♣ bid as FSF...
except its moderately bad opening not even 12 HCP.
#4
Posted 2011-June-13, 10:16
cloa513, on 2011-June-13, 08:22, said:
except its moderately bad opening not even 12 HCP.
It does have 12 HCP, and it's a good 12 at that....
Wayne Somerville
Page 1 of 1

Help
