Tournament hand, MP
Page 1 of 1
ATB (E/W) is one bid worse than the other?
#1
Posted 2011-May-22, 00:46
Tournament hand, MP
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#2
Posted 2011-May-22, 00:54
West doesn't raise with 4-card support but South raises with 1? Are they sharing the bong?
#3
Posted 2011-May-22, 00:57
Bbradley62, on 2011-May-22, 00:54, said:
West doesn't raise with 4-card support but South raises with 1? Are they sharing the bong?
Im not sharing, I've corrected the auction
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#4
Posted 2011-May-22, 02:32
Prefer x rather than 1H by the East hand. After East's 2S overbid, what on earth is 2NT? by West with 4 card S support? personally both East and West are off with the pixies here.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#5
Posted 2011-May-22, 04:17
Is one bid worse than the other? Hm, I don't know, they are all pretty bad. But East made two of them and West only one....
OK, the first 1♥ wasn't that horrible. I prefer double, but I can live with 1♥. 2♠ however is an overbid by about 6-points, now double is really clear-cut. Given what East showed, West has a 100% raise to 4♠, and I have no idea what (s)he was fooling around with 2NT for - presumably thought it was forcing, which is not that unreasonable, but even if it were forcing I still don't see the point.
OK, the first 1♥ wasn't that horrible. I prefer double, but I can live with 1♥. 2♠ however is an overbid by about 6-points, now double is really clear-cut. Given what East showed, West has a 100% raise to 4♠, and I have no idea what (s)he was fooling around with 2NT for - presumably thought it was forcing, which is not that unreasonable, but even if it were forcing I still don't see the point.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#6
Posted 2011-May-22, 19:58
This hand should have been posted in the interesting bridge hands forum. A major suit lead is needed to beat the contract.
NS bid reasonably, I wouldn't worry about what EW were doing.
NS bid reasonably, I wouldn't worry about what EW were doing.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
Page 1 of 1

Help
