mcphee, on 2011-April-22, 08:34, said:
Choosing the best bid is not always easy and this hand does pose some problems. The hand is quite offensive and will take a lot of tricks if partner does hold 4H, which is not a 100% requirement for the t/o dble. I like to use a responsive dble over 3S usually a hand with 2 places to play, when partner bids 4D I can comfortably bid H now having told the other hand I also have some C.
With the bidding you gave I would assume 5D was a cue bid in support of H, if not we need to have a talk.
Maybe we should have a talk.
To me, the 5
♦ bid is natural and strong - too strong to overcall 3
♦ (which is quite strong). Technically, it is not forcing, but opposite a hand that could freely bid 4
♥ over 3
♠ it is almost forcing.
If this bid is not natural, what is partner supposed to bid at his first opportunity on:
---
Ax
AKJTxxx
KJxx
Does he really have to bid 3
♠? This is a very good hand - really too strong to overcall 3
♦ but not so strong as to demand game opposite a balanced 6 count (unless it is the right 6 count). Overcalling 4
♦ is not an available choice for most players as that shows diamonds and hearts.
It makes sense to me that 5
♦ is strong and natural. With a big hand with hearts that wants to look for slam over partner's 4
♥ call, the big hand can cue bid 4
♠.
By the way, don't ask me how you are supposed to get to 6
♣ on the example hand that I provided.