opps opem 3rd seat, easy?
#1
Posted 2011-March-18, 17:01
(P) P (1♦) ?
Q987, KJ, J2, AQT65
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#3
Posted 2011-March-19, 01:52
#4
Posted 2011-March-19, 03:01
This would be a minimum overcall for me if not vul, i.e. I would pass without the ♣10.
#5
Posted 2011-March-19, 03:45
#6
Posted 2011-March-19, 03:53
#7
Posted 2011-March-19, 06:07
jillybean, on 2011-March-18, 17:01, said:
(P) P (1♦) ?
Q987, KJ, J2, AQT65
I would bid 2♣.
If I give points: 2♣= 90% pass=10%
Just to say, that If my P would pass, I would not blame him, but I am an easy balancer.
#8
Posted 2011-March-19, 06:59
#9
Posted 2011-March-19, 09:06
X-3 for -800
This was an automatic overcall for me however my partner has warned me of these hands before and says he would rather I overcall
1♠ here. Others say you need a 6th ♣ to make the 2♣ call.
Gerben, I shouldn't be asking but what is "Sabine's rule"?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#10
Posted 2011-March-19, 09:10
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#11
Posted 2011-March-19, 17:06
jillybean, on 2011-March-19, 09:06, said:
Get and read "I love this game" by Sabine. She talks about how 2♣ over 1♦ and 2♦ over 1♣ should be bid as often as possible because it is hard for opponents to sort out the majors.
I'd also bid 2♣ automatic at MP with your hand. I probably wouldn't anymore at teams.
#12
Posted 2011-March-20, 08:35
#13
Posted 2011-March-20, 13:29
Its designed to help in situations just like this, no T/O dbl possibility and if u bid u minor in 2 level u 4 card major will bite the dust.
They say its more useful in long run to use 1Nt as Raptor than a bid that tells 15-18 bal. hand. Is it, i dont know, but i know its pretty popular convention at least among tournament players in Europe.
#14
Posted 2011-March-21, 08:34
The hand is rubbish, so I'd rather bid 2♣ than 1NT Raptor.
#15
Posted 2011-March-21, 09:51
too bad CHO has two clubs and not one, he could have redoubled. like this it doesn't seem normal but maybe he gets a read on a confident pass?
George Carlin
#16
Posted 2011-March-21, 10:02
Unless you play Polish NT / Raptor, the convention was made for this
kind of hand.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#17
Posted 2011-March-21, 10:05
gwnn, on 2011-March-21, 09:51, said:
too bad CHO has two clubs and not one, he could have redoubled. like this it doesn't seem normal but maybe he gets a read on a confident pass?
Yes, we talked about that but thought it wasn't automatic.
There's definately 2 camps here, those that would and those that wouldn't and I'm not sure where I sit.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#18
Posted 2011-March-21, 10:46
This is a horror film case what can happen if u take action here, most likely u get a bad result if u dont take the action here. Lets see; u pass - LHO bid 1Nt - prd pass- RHO bids 2♦and now? Do u take action now, or become the legendary 2♦guys; those who let oppos play 2♦when all others where from +110 to +170 in they own game
Thats MP´s; u bid like others do, not as u shld do.
#19
Posted 2011-March-21, 12:17
#20
Posted 2011-March-24, 05:46
Please jilly, learn from this wonderful -800 instead of feeling in good company and repeating it.

Help
