BBO Discussion Forums: Leading against grand slam - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Leading against grand slam what shall I lead?

#1 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2011-March-14, 23:46


What will you lead?
0

#2 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-March-15, 03:53

♣Q, I don't like any other lead
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#3 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,045
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-March-15, 04:55

#1 4C is ok, 5C is also not out of this world, but 4C is enough.

#2 The Ace of clubs, ...,

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-March-15, 06:10

I'm going to give opps credit for their bidding and lead the spade T. Club can be into the dbl void :P
0

#5 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-March-15, 17:41

Lead trumps against a grand slam :P?

Oh wait, I can't revoke in a suit I don't hold, so maybe ♠?
foobar on BBO
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2011-March-16, 11:49

4♣ was not enough, 5♣ is obvious IMO.

lead ♠10
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#7 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-March-17, 08:17

Agree with Gonzalo, 5C is not enough. It is easy to think of 4C as reasonable, but I don't think that that's right.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#8 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2011-March-22, 23:25

Anyone who can avoid leading a ♣ will be successful. Declarer holds an indispensable loser in ♠ which can only be disposed with a ruff and discard in a ♣ lead (both declarer and dummy are void in ♣).
0

#9 User is offline   mfa1010 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 796
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark

Posted 2011-March-23, 12:48

4♣ is too wimpish B-)
Michael Askgaard
0

#10 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-March-25, 03:23

4♣ is wimpish, but so is 5♣ from partner imo...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users