Page 1 of 1
AQ94 JT762 43 K2 Opening bid?
#1
Posted 2011-March-22, 08:30
Basic 2/1/ Match-pointed pairs, EW vul. As dealer, South, do you open ♠ AQ94 ♥ JT762 ♦ 43 ♣ K2
What if the major honours were swapped? What if the major suits were exchanged?
What if the major honours were swapped? What if the major suits were exchanged?
#2
Posted 2011-March-22, 08:38
Oops sr I voted "sometimes" because I would open in 3rd/4th except maybe when vulnerable at IMPs. Given the conditions my answer is no.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#5
Posted 2011-March-22, 09:58
I don't like to open light in 2/1 without a clear rebid. Hands 1 & 2 don't have clear rebids and lack extra distribution (5422 is balanced imo). Hand 3 has a clear rebid but also lacks extra distribution. In 1st seat they're all passes for me.
I'd only open hands 2 and 3 in 3rd seat.
If your partner has a balanced 12-13 count with a 5 card minor suit, we'll be in a very light game. With imps scoring it might be justified, but not in MP imo.
I'd only open hands 2 and 3 in 3rd seat.
If your partner has a balanced 12-13 count with a 5 card minor suit, we'll be in a very light game. With imps scoring it might be justified, but not in MP imo.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#6
Posted 2011-March-22, 11:58
yes, easy on all three but I love to open lite but tell pard and esp. the opp.
on one and two I pass if pard bids 1nt and rebid 2s! if pard makes a 2/1.
on one and two I pass if pard bids 1nt and rebid 2s! if pard makes a 2/1.
#8
Posted 2011-March-23, 13:20
Thank you to those who voted. I'm grateful for the comments. Whatever the other merits of 2/1, it seems to me that not opening on such hands is a drawback of the system.
♠ AQ9x ♥ JTxxx ♦ xx ♣ Kx seems doubly flawed, compared with
♠ JTxx ♥ AQ9xx ♦ xx ♣ Kx or
♠ JTxxx ♥ AQ9x ♦ xx ♣ Kx but many would not open any of them.
♠ AQ9x ♥ JTxxx ♦ xx ♣ Kx seems doubly flawed, compared with
♠ JTxx ♥ AQ9xx ♦ xx ♣ Kx or
♠ JTxxx ♥ AQ9x ♦ xx ♣ Kx but many would not open any of them.
#11
Posted 2011-March-24, 04:56
AQ9xx JTxx xx Kx
maybe just maybe.
I'd be happy to open the first one 1S in a canapé system.
maybe just maybe.
I'd be happy to open the first one 1S in a canapé system.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#12
Posted 2011-March-24, 08:37
well, I tend to open all those hands...
but I see that most of you aren't.
SO....I guess i am too agressive.....
but I see that most of you aren't.
SO....I guess i am too agressive.....
♥Bob Herreman ♥
#13
Posted 2011-March-24, 08:44
Hands like these are the reason that I play strong club systems
(For the record, I would pass with all of these hands playing 2/1 GF)
(For the record, I would pass with all of these hands playing 2/1 GF)
Alderaan delenda est
#14
Posted 2011-March-24, 09:10
Yup, pass all three playing 2/1, amazed so many have said otherwise. I'd open all three playing sensible methods.
#15
Posted 2011-March-26, 09:42
It has to depend on partnership agreement. My instinct is "no", but there again I'd open a "weak both majors" 2♦. Without that, or similar, a partnership would have to agree on minimum strength for a 1M open. I like to keep it sound, but if partner wanted to play it this weak I would have to adjust the values of my responses.
#16
Posted 2011-March-27, 06:13
I voted that I would only open the last one (mostly because of the rebid issues), but I've been convinced that in 2/1 pass is definitely correct.
Page 1 of 1

Help

