BBO Discussion Forums: Not Enough Differentiation? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Not Enough Differentiation?

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2011-March-07, 00:21


Over North's 2♥, Souths chose a variety of bids:
2♠: Default response; rebid suit -- 5+S; 11-21HCP; 12-22 total points
3♣: 5+S; 21-HCP; 14-22 total points; forcing to 3N
3♥: Raise responder's response -- 3+H; 5+S; 11+HCP; 12-15 total points
3♠: 6+S; 21-HCP; 16-22 total points
4♥: 3+H; 5+S; 21-HCP; 16-22 total points
4♠: Game; 21-HCP; strong rebiddable S; 16-22 total points

NorthGIB passed when South chose 2♠. Given the definition provided for 3♣, and given that GIB doesn't think 2♠ is forcing, shouldn't the explanation of 2♠ be:
"Default response; rebid suit -- 5+S; 11-12HCP; 12-13 total points; non-forcing" ?
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users