2♣:2♦
2♠:2N
2♣ gf, 2♦ waiting (2♥ bust)
Is your 2♠ bid typically 5 or 6 and what sort of hand will 2N show?
Page 1 of 1
2C:2D 2S:2N
#1
Posted 2011-March-15, 21:58
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#2
Posted 2011-March-15, 22:49
2♠ is an unbalanced hand or semi-balanced hand with 5+ spades. 6 will be quite frequent, but 55 or a strong 5431 is certainly possible.
2NT to me suggests a quite good hand with no fit. Quite good because it is stealing nt and usually I'd just bid my suit (even 4 card ones if 1444 or 2(344)) at the 3-level if I wasn't going to support spades.
2NT to me suggests a quite good hand with no fit. Quite good because it is stealing nt and usually I'd just bid my suit (even 4 card ones if 1444 or 2(344)) at the 3-level if I wasn't going to support spades.
#3
Posted 2011-March-16, 11:43
Will partner routinely support openers 2M bid with 2 card support? (2344)
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#4
Posted 2011-March-16, 11:53
2d is art. and gf promising any random a or k.
2s is natural 5 card suit or more, 4 loser hand.
2nt is just some bal hand with at least a k and denies 3s. I wont bid a 4 card suit over 2s and try to avoid weak 5 card minor suits. I do not worry about the weaker hand playing nt.
2s is natural 5 card suit or more, 4 loser hand.
2nt is just some bal hand with at least a k and denies 3s. I wont bid a 4 card suit over 2s and try to avoid weak 5 card minor suits. I do not worry about the weaker hand playing nt.
#5
Posted 2011-March-16, 12:33
2S only promises 5 so responder shouldn't routinely support on 2 cards. It's probably more often 6+ than 5, (more hands with 6+ suits qualify as within a trick of game, also people are more conservative opening 2c with 2-suiters), but even so for close slam decisions there is big difference between 8 cd fit vs. 9 cd fit, or 9 cd fit vs. 10 cd fit; knowledge of a 3rd card is valuable even when opener has 6+.
I also wouldn't worry about declaring NT with the weak hand. Reasonably often:
-opener has solid 6+ suit, insists on major anyway
-it was responder's honor(s) that needed protection from the lead
-opener's side suit stopper wasn't broken (AK, A, KQ alone) and it didn't matter significantly
- partner's stopper is the ace and you have 9 tricks off the top
- opp's honors were onside and it didn't matter.
- they lead wrong suit
- if opener had a semi-bal hand with lots of tenaces to protect arguably he could have chosen to rebid 2nt
I think bidding 4 cd suits as MBodell suggests will hurt you in finding alternative strains more than any occasional wrong-sided 3nt.
I also wouldn't worry about declaring NT with the weak hand. Reasonably often:
-opener has solid 6+ suit, insists on major anyway
-it was responder's honor(s) that needed protection from the lead
-opener's side suit stopper wasn't broken (AK, A, KQ alone) and it didn't matter significantly
- partner's stopper is the ace and you have 9 tricks off the top
- opp's honors were onside and it didn't matter.
- they lead wrong suit
- if opener had a semi-bal hand with lots of tenaces to protect arguably he could have chosen to rebid 2nt
I think bidding 4 cd suits as MBodell suggests will hurt you in finding alternative strains more than any occasional wrong-sided 3nt.
Page 1 of 1

Help
