BBO Discussion Forums: lead against nt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

lead against nt easy?

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,074
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2011-March-03, 11:19

rho opens 1♣
1♣:1♥ 1N:AP

You hold 9854,852,KJ6,KT5 and your lead agreements are standard, 4th best

Do you lead ♠4, is there any other card you would consider?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2011-March-03, 12:08

If I lead a spade, it would be the 9. I don't want to mislead partner into thinking that I have honor(s) in spades.

I would also consider leading a high heart. But it seems likely that spades is the right suit to lead.
0

#3 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2011-March-03, 12:37

Spade is the "obvious" lead, and I may lead it to stay with the field at MP. I will lead a high one (9 or 8, per my agreements) if I choose that route. A heart can hardly hurt, though; at IMPs I'd probably lead one, since I think it's more likely to be right. I'd definitely lead a high heart at IMPs if it were doubleton.

Pard has almost an opening hand and didn't double, so I'm counting on him having cards somewhere in the opps' suits. Clubs might be right, but it looks suicidal to lead one from this holding. I'm also never leading a diamond, ever. So heart it is.

edit: also P will shift to a spade / signal for a spade shift when it's right, since it's likely that opener does not have 4, and he can see how many are in dummy.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#4 User is offline   daveharty 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 694
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI
  • Interests:Bridge, juggling, disc sports, Jane Austen, writing, cosmology, and Mexican food

Posted 2011-March-03, 14:40

View Postwyman, on 2011-March-03, 12:37, said:

Pard has almost an opening hand and didn't double, so I'm counting on him having cards somewhere in the opps' suits. Clubs might be right, but it looks suicidal to lead one from this holding. I'm also never leading a diamond, ever. So heart it is.


I agree. It seems like whenever I lead a spade in this situation, dummy comes down with Tx and declarer has AJx and I've solved a problem for her, or lost a tempo. So we might as well try to hit partner's heart suit, planning on repeated heart leads when I get in with my kings. I suppose this all depends somewhat on how likely these opponents are to raise partner's major suit response with three cards.
Revised Bridge Personality: 44 43 33 44

Dianne, I'm holding in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies... --Agent Dale Cooper
0

#5 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2011-March-03, 15:55

Spade is completely normal, heart lead just seems bad to me.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#6 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-March-06, 00:21

High spade seems normal to me. If you ordered me to lead a non-spade I would give serious consideration to a diamond, on the theory that 1C-then-1NT limits declarer to at most 3 diamonds. If this is an "up the line" partnership the diamond becomes more appealing since dummy won't have 4 or 5 diamonds.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users