Competitive decision Playing MP
#1
Posted 2004-September-04, 03:20
♠x
♥Qxx
♦K10xxxx
♣KJx
pa - 1♣ - pa - 1♠
2♦ - 2♠ - 3♣* - 3♠
pa - pa - Dbl - pa
???
* Good diamond raise (but usually not unabalnced with 4♦).
#2
Posted 2004-September-04, 04:03
Stefan
#3
Posted 2004-September-04, 06:16
#4
Posted 2004-September-04, 06:39
if that's wrong, next time he'll bid in that situation
#5
Posted 2004-September-04, 11:45
#6
Posted 2004-September-07, 05:42
paulhar, on Sep 4 2004, 06:45 PM, said:
Indeed! Partner had...
♠xxx
♥Jxxx
♦AQJ
♣AQ10
...and 3♠x ended +1 when the dummy presented the 4432 shape (declarer 5215).
4♦ is going down only finding the ♥ruff, else is +130.
#7
Posted 2004-September-07, 08:18
luke warm, on Sep 4 2004, 12:39 PM, said:
if that's wrong, next time he'll bid in that situation
pass if wrong change pd or dont overcall 2d lightly next time.
#8
Posted 2004-September-07, 08:34
Bridge is easy after you see all hands, isn't it...
#9
Posted 2004-September-07, 09:14
Now I should pass, but my ♦s are TOO long!! So 3♠* will probably be makeble, and I think the best thing to recover from my mistake (not jumping) is to bid 4♦...
#10
Posted 2004-September-07, 11:53
Poky, on Sep 7 2004, 03:42 AM, said:
paulhar, on Sep 4 2004, 06:45 PM, said:
Indeed! Partner had...
♠xxx
♥Jxxx
♦AQJ
♣AQ10
...and 3♠x ended +1 when the dummy presented the 4432 shape (declarer 5215).
4♦ is going down only finding the ♥ruff, else is +130.
I would have overcalled 1N with your pard's hand; certainly AQT over the bidder is worth more than 6 points.
I think the double of 3♠ should be defined as cooperative; meaning if you have a normal hand for your 2♦ overcall, pass, otherwise, take a shot at 4♦.
I think I have about as typical hand has pard can expect for 2♦. 1363 shape and normal defense.
I don't think I like pard's double here. He has too many values concentrated in diamonds for you to make an intelligent decision over 3♠. Too many times 3♠ is peeling.
Give pard instead:
Kxx
Qxxx
QJx
AQx
and I much prefer a double.

Help
